Zimbabwe exemption permit saga: Home Affairs facing fresh lawsuit as
another challenger enters fray
News 24 – 28 July 2022
- The Zimbabwean Immigration Federation is
taking the Department of Home Affairs to court over the termination of the
Zimbabwean Exemption Permit.
- The organisation wants the department to start
the review process for permits afresh.
- It says its members will face discrimination
and reprisal if they go back to Zimbabwe.
The Department of Home Affairs is facing another lawsuit relating to the
looming termination of the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP).
The ZEP is a special dispensation permit established more than 10 years
ago that gives legal protection to an estimated 178 000 Zimbabwean nationals to
live, work and study in South Africa.
However, the Cabinet decided in January that the arrangement must be
terminated by December and that applicants should apply for a visa to remain in
South Africa, based on a list of critical skills needed in the country.
In June, the Helen Suzman Foundation said it would be taking the
government to court for discontinuing the permits. It said termination would
turn ZEP holders in South Africa into undocumented migrants and force them to
return to Zimbabwe if they did not meet the strict conditions of one of the
visa categories on offer. The foundation said they would face similar
conditions to what had led them to flee.
Now, another organisation – the Zimbabwean Immigration Federation
(ZIF) – is also hauling the department to court.
In its papers, the organisation cited the Department of Home Affairs,
President Cyril Ramaphosa, the South African Police Service, the South African
National Defence Force, and the Border Management Authority.
The application, filed at the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, was aimed
at interdicting government departments from arresting or deporting ZEP holders
once their permits expired at the end of the year.
South Africans, refugees and migrants use judo to
fight xenophobia
In Johannesburg's Alexandra township , a recently
renovated building serves has the first "dojo" of this deprived
neighbourhood. Around 20 schoolchildren are here to "learn to live
together", according to the coordinator of the "Judo for Peace"
organisation. "Friendship, respect they are all things that are taught on
the mat, on the tatami , as we...
The organisation also wanted ZEP holders to be able to leave or enter
the country legally if all their other travel documentation was in order.
In the second part of its application, the ZIF wanted home affairs to
review the decision not to extend the ZEP. The organisation also wanted the
department to restart the review process for permits and, in the meantime,
allow ZEP holders to remain in the country.
It contended that the termination of the ZEP would "impose a severe
administrative burden on the Department of Home Affairs – who have not
made reasonable steps to ensure they will be able to deal with the impending
flood of applications by Zimbabwean Exemption Permit holders that will be
lodged under the Refugees Act".
The Gukurahundi massacre and apartheid
In its court papers, the organisation further argued that members of the
ZIF were victims of the Gukurahundi massacre who had been left homeless.
"They were asylum seekers in South Africa before the DZP
[Dispensation of Zimbabweans Project] in 2009 and have since remained in South
Africa as holders of permits issued under the subsequent ministerial exemption
dispensation."
Cabinet created the DZP in April 2009, which was later renamed the ZEP.
The organisation said they were also worried that members of the LGBTQI
community would face discrimination in Zimbabwe.
"Sending asylum seekers and refugees back to Zimbabwe will expose
them to persecution in stark violation of South African law and international
law," it argued in its court papers.
The ZIF said Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi was allowed to
withdraw the permits under the immigration law, provided there was a good
cause. However, it said the minister had erred in his decision to end the
permits because he "failed to take into account relevant considerations in
making the impugned decision".
The ZIF added:
The Minister's approach to the withdrawal of the
exemptions that had been granted to Zimbabwean nationals is reminiscent of the
brutal international migration policy adopted by the Apartheid regime, which
imposed blunt immigration controls and tight restrictions on Africans it
considered undesirable, regardless of the severe harm caused to their human
dignity and rights.
It argued that the decision to terminate the ZEP would also lead to
families being torn apart as most ZIF members didn't qualify for alternative
visas under the critical skills category.
"Many Zimbabwean nationals who hold the ministerial exemptions
permits have married South African nationals or have children who hold South
African identification and travel documents. The minister's decision
accordingly threatens to break up families and displace many people if
implemented."
Permit holders were also likely to lose their businesses and property,
the court papers stated.
Home affairs spokesperson Siya Qoza said the department's lawyers had
filed a motion to oppose the ZIF court action.
Qoza said the department was facing four court cases in the Gauteng High
Court in Pretoria regarding the ZEP.
www.samigration.com