The #Laundry: How Eswatini became a transit hub for southern Africa’s money laundering networks


Leaked files obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists show how a Dubai-based gold trader cosied up to the Swazi king’s son-in-law to allegedly launder money from South Africa to Dubai through the tiny African kingdom.
Leaked documents from the Eswatini Financial Intelligence Unit (EFIU) reveal how, in late 2018, the kingdom’s authorities began secretly investigating suspicious payments amounting to tens of millions of rands between entities linked to two politically connected businessmen.

The investigation raised red flags regarding the relationship between Keenin Schofield, son-in-law of King Mswati III, and a Dubai-based businessman, Alistair Mathias, who claimed to be a close friend of the king.
Mathias was accused in a 2023 Al Jazeera documentary of being one of the architects behind a vast scheme to smuggle gold out of Zimbabwe, allegedly with the complicity of the Mnangagwa regime.

The leaks reveal how millions of rands emanating from a Johannesburg company named AMFS moved rapidly through entities controlled by Schofield and Mathias before ultimately being transferred to Dubai.
This raised suspicions within Eswatini’s authorities that the pair “might be using the country as a conduit for smuggling illegally obtained Gold out of Africa through Eswatini to the United Arab Emirates under the guise of a company,” and that this was being done to “conceal the true source and purpose of the funds received and transferred”, according to a letter the EFIU wrote to the country’s tax authority.

The Leaks
The leaks now known as the “Swazi Secrets” comprise more than 890,000 documents from the Eswatini Financial Intelligence Unit obtained by Distributed Denial of Secrets, a non-profit devoted to publishing and archiving leaks. The documents were shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), who in turn shared it with seven media partners as part of their investigation.

Eswatini
Eswatini is one of the last absolute monarchies on the continent and has been ruled by King Mswati III since 1986. The country forms part of the South African Common Monetary Area, which means that its local currency, the lilangeni, is pegged at 1:1 with the rand.
Back in 2018, Swazi jeweller Keenin Schofield appeared to be an up-and-coming businessman. His company, Schofield & Co., was making a name for itself selling high-end custom watches and jewellery to a slew of wealthy celebrities. One of his more eye-catching Instagram posts shows Schofield delivering a diamond-encrusted pendant to Fifa World Cup-winning midfielder Paul Pogba.
Less publicised, however, is Schofield’s run-in with the law. In 2009, aged 20, he was arrested for smuggling, pleaded guilty in a Zimbabwean court for illegal possession of diamonds and was fined $400.

Also less visible are Schofield’s links to the Swazi royal family. There is very little public information on his marriage to Princess Temtsimba, one of the king’s daughters, but he confirmed the marriage to amaBhungane and said that he and the princess have two children.

Schofield says he met Mathias at some point during 2018.
Mathias was not widely known until last year, when Al Jazeera aired its undercover exposé on the “Gold Mafia” operating in southern Africa. In secretly recorded interviews with journalists posing as crooked businessmen, Mathias claimed to be one of the kingpins using gold to move and “cleanse” cash on behalf of Zimbabwean clients.
In the interviews, Mathias hinted at a larger operation on the continent, telling Al Jazeera’s undercover reporters that he “moves” gold worth between $70-million and $80-million each month through Ghana and southern Africa to Dubai.
Mathias later denied to Al Jazeera that he had ever laundered money or traded illegal gold.

Putting the ‘Special’ in Special Economic Zone
Schofield says that he and Mathias teamed up to build a large gold refinery in Eswatini’s newly created Special Economic Zone (SEZ), which was intended to be a major hub for commodity refining and trading. The SEZ was described as the “brainchild” of King Mswati III.

“I had met all the relevant stakeholders in Eswatini to get the licensing done … but I just wasn’t able to get it over the line in terms of raising enough capital,” Schofield told us.

That’s where Mathias came in. He would put up the money and was “leading” the project. Schofield was to act as the local partner, by building relationships in Eswatini and introducing Mathias to “relevant people”.  His own company, Schofield & Co., would be one of the “agents” that would buy finished gold products like gold coins from the new refinery and sell them on.

But far from being a landmark investment in Eswatini, the millions of rands that flowed through the companies of the two businessmen yielded nothing tangible. Instead, all it did was raise suspicions at the EFIU and Eswatini Central Bank.
What is a Financial Intelligence Unit?

Every country that is part of the modern global financial system is required to establish a financial intelligence unit. These units are established to monitor the flow of money using information passed to them by the country’s commercial banks and other financial institutions.

The main purpose of these units is to detect money laundering, which is the act of attempting to hide the origin and source of funds derived from criminal activities. In other words, money laundering is about making dirty money look legitimate. While intelligence units can gather information from a variety of sources, including local and international law enforcement agencies, they cannot prosecute cases.

The business relationship between the two developed quickly. According to Schofield & Co’s FNB bank statements, which we obtained through the leaks, Schofield travelled to Dubai in June 2018.

Cash flows
Upon returning later that month, Schofield’s business account received three large cash deposits amounting to R840,000 on the same day. All three deposits were made with the same reference: “Watches & Jewellery”.   A few days later, Schofield & Co. made a single payment of R740,000 to Mathias Holdings in Dubai.

Large cash deposits are particularly suspicious in the eyes of financial intelligence units, because cash is untraceable. Judging by the identical references used, the deposits appeared to be related, underscored by the fact that when added up, these deposits amounted to a nice round number — exactly R840,000.

In money laundering parlance, the term “smurfing” is used to describe the practice of breaking a single transaction up into smaller transactions to avoid detection by authorities. Schofield’s company account had never before received cash deposits. Yet in one day, it received R840,000 via three separate transactions.

It seems that Schofield’s bankers at FNB immediately became suspicious. On 2 July, FNB’s in-house financial crime analyst sent an email to the EFIU containing Schofield & Co.’s company documents, which included earlier bank statements for the company. The EFIU had been alerted.

A similar sequence occurred a week later, on 11 July. Six cash deposits amounting to R1.68-million were made on the same day, at the same branch, to Schofield & Co.’s account. This time each deposit came with a different reference, including “Rolex Presidential”, “Diamondstraponrolex” and “Diamond Setting”.

The next day, Schofield & Co. sent R1.54 million — almost all the money it had just received — to Mathias Holdings in Dubai.
In a matter of weeks, Schofield & Co. had received millions of rands, dwarfing all the money that had arrived in their bank account in the preceding nine months.

As soon as the money left for Dubai, the pattern repeated. On 13 July, six cash deposits amounting to R1.52-million, all with the reference “Stock Purchase”, were made on the same day before a single payment for over R2.5-million was sent overseas to Mathias Holdings after a delay of two weeks.

Alistair Mathias did not respond to requests for comment.
Schofield said he did not recall the deposits when we raised them during our interview. He did not respond to subsequent follow-up questions regarding the matter either.

There was a subsequent lull in the account for a couple of months before even larger amounts of money swept through it in November and December.

At the same time as cash was rolling into Schofield’s company account, seemingly destined for Dubai, the pair established a company named Mint of Eswatini in which they were equal shareholders. This company immediately obtained a licence to operate in the SEZ, which provided tax incentives. Schofield told us that he thought this would be the vehicle that would achieve his dream of developing a gold refinery in the country.

Enter AMFS
In November, instead of cash deposits, money began arriving in the account of Schofield & Co. via international transfers from an obscure company in Johannesburg named AMFS.

On 2 November, a single payment of nearly R6-million arrived with the reference “amfs”. On the same day, just over R5.3-million was wired to Mathias Holdings in Dubai. South Africa to Eswatini, Eswatini to Dubai. The money was moving faster than a jet.
“It’s never proof of anything, but I always think it’s a red flag when you have a company that receives and dissipates money immediately,” said Paul Holden, who assisted the Zondo Commission on State Capture as an investigator.

“Most legitimate companies hold on to some of their assets for reserves, they pay office costs… They have all these extraneous expenses that reflect on their account, and you can tell an operating business’s account pretty quickly.”

Between the end of November and the middle of December, AMFS sent another 10 transfers amounting to over R67-million to Schofield & Co. But this time, instead of going straight to Dubai, the money was transferred to the FNB account of Mint of Eswatini, which then sent three international payments to Mathias Holdings in Dubai.

Excerpts of Schofield & Co. FNB accounts (November-December 2018)
Despite the plans to build a refinery, which would entail significant costs in Eswatini, the millions arriving in the country were immediately sent to Dubai. Schofield claims that this was to pay for inventory like gold bars and coins. The volumes represented an enormous increase in the turnover through the account of Schofield & Co, which earlier in the year — before Schofield had met Mathias — would receive hundreds of thousands of rands a month.

Excerpts of Schofield & Co. FNB accounts (November-December 2018)
Schofield said Mathias alone controlled Mint of Eswatini’s bank accounts, even though Schofield was a 50% shareholder and a director of the company.

Schofield said he thought the cash coming from AMFS was Mathias’ money, used to purchase gold inventory: “We were receiving it [the money] and the idea was that that was part of the investment,” he told us.

Excerpt of Mint of Eswatini FNB bank account (November-December 2018)
Schofield alleged that Mathias sent money to Schofield & Co., which then passed the money to Mint of Eswatini based on invoices Mathias generated for gold bars and coins.

Mint, in turn, sent the money to Mathias Holdings in Dubai, ostensibly for the purchase of gold products. This suggests that Mathias was paying himself through Schofield & Co and Mint of Eswatini, something that would appear to be highly inefficient.

Excerpts of Schofield & Co. FNB accounts (December 2018-January 2019)
A Central Bank of Eswatini letter from September 2019 asked: “Why doesn’t Schofield and Company Jewelers directly purchase the gold bars from Mathias Holding FZC?”

Mint of Eswatini added no markup to the transactions, according to the letter; it was merely a conduit for the money and supposed gold bars and coins.

Its bank account was opened days before it started receiving payments from Schofield & Co and, in January 2019, after a brief flurry of activity when the money from Schofield & Co. began pouring in, this account went dormant. FNB later froze Mint of Eswatini’s accounts.

The insertion of Mint of Eswatini into the chain of transfers from South Africa to Dubai via Eswatini could have been, according to the analysis of the EFIU, part of a “layering” pattern.

According to a recognised definition of money laundering, “layering” refers to attempts to hide or obscure the source of illicit money (money generated from criminal activity) through a series of elaborate transactions across different countries and entities.
On 20 December 2018, the EFIU sent a “Suspicious Transaction Report” to the country’s Anti-Corruption Commission to encourage it to look into the matter and, if necessary, investigate further.

The report provided a summary of the payments made in November and December, raising suspicions about “the manner in which all these transactions are conducted, especially receipts of huge sums of money, which were immediately disposed-of to one of the Directors company in Dubai [sic]”.

The EFIU was of the opinion that Mint of Eswatini could be involved “in some sort of criminality bordering around corruption and money laundering”.

When we put all this to Schofield, pointing out that the transactions bore the signs of money laundering and that he may therefore have been party to a crime, he replied: “Definitely, I mean I can’t sit here and deny things, that would be stupid of me.”
He pointed out that he was young at the time (29) and that, with the benefit of experience, probably would have recognised what was going on.

“Now that we can sit down and discuss it and talk it through, we can highlight all the problems and all the things that I didn’t see. But at the time I wanted to open up a refinery. As I say, Alistair came across as a person who was well ahead of my understanding of how the business actually functions. And I was kinda going along his lead,” said Schofield.

In January 2019 the two parted ways, according to Schofield, and Mint of Eswatini’s refinery was never built.
We don’t know where the money went after being transferred to Mathias Holdings in Dubai.
Holden said the city is among the “jurisdictions around the world which make money laundering incredibly easy, which are basically not compliant with anti-money laundering provisions and where it’s almost impossible to see those authorities collaborating in tracking illicit financial flows”.

Despite his newfound fame due to the Gold Mafia exposé, Mathias was not interested in responding to our lengthy set of questions. However, the letters “AMFS” on Schofield & Co’s bank statements provided a clue about the origin of the funds going through Eswatini.

The Big League
AMFS Solutions was little known in 2018, but soon began to attract notoriety following accusations of money laundering. The business was under new ownership, having been bought by Johannesburg-based businessman Carlo Stickling, who had acquired it from AMFS’s previous owner, Kalandra Viljoen, in November 2017

At almost the same time AMFS began transferring money to Schofield & Co., records show that two new directors were appointed — Mohamed Khan and the since-deceased Sohail Jiwani.

As amaBhungane has previously reported, these two have, over several years, allegedly aided a variety of illicit financial operations by facilitating the expatriation of funds. This occurred most famously through Sasfin Bank, where their company SALT Asset Management was a broker representing several large clients. This most notably included Zimbabwean mogul Simon Rudland and partner Ebrahim Adamjee’s Gold Leaf Tobacco Corporation.

Khan was also introduced to the public in the Gold Mafia exposé, in which he was accused of being one of the major money launderers in South Africa.

Quite why Khan and his business associate were purported directors of AMFS for roughly 2½ months before abruptly resigning at the start of February 2019 remains a mystery. Khan did not respond to any of our emails.

When we messaged Stickling to engage, he told us that he could not help and then promptly blocked us.
Before AMFS began sending money to Schofield in Eswatini, its accounts had already been temporarily frozen in connection with allegedly receiving money from the looting of Namibia’s SME Bank.

In a tale eerily similar to that of VBS, the scale of the alleged theft and fraud perpetrated by SME’s executives led to its collapse.
The liquidators alleged that a portion of the millions of dollars stolen from the bank was laundered through AMFS, which they bluntly labelled “a money laundering machine”. A report by the EFIU noted the bad publicity around AMFS at the time.

A closer look at AMFS’s bank statements shows two names popping up repeatedly in relation to payments into the account: Northern Spark and JR Technical.

Both have previously been identified by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) as among the suppliers of gold in a massive alleged refund fraud perpetrated against SARS that ran to billions of rands. The SARS claims remain the subject of legal dispute.
It is unclear what to read into the appointment of Khan and Jiwani as directors of AMFS in this period. Bank statements continued to be directed to Stickling, who was reappointed as sole director shortly afterwards.
However, the fact that AMFS channelled money through Eswatini to Mathias in Dubai suggests that alleged money laundering networks in southern Africa were more integrated than was initially thought.
Back to the present

Today, Eswatini’s SEZ lies largely dormant. The lots are filled with weeds and the wide roads are empty. The refinery was never built, and the only completed building on the vast property is a government office.
The paper trail in the leak does not shed light on where investigations by Eswatini authorities ended up. The last indication was in 2022, when the country’s Anti-Corruption Commission sent a progress report on investigations to the EFIU. Nearly four years after Mint of Eswatini was founded, Schofield and Mathias’s involvement in suspicious transactions was still listed as an “active investigation.” No further details were provided.

Schofield told us that Schofield & Co.’s company accounts with FNB were never frozen or closed, and that he never received a call from officials at the bank asking him about any of the transactions involving Mathias.
Mathias told Al Jazeera that he had never laundered money or traded in illegal gold. According to the staff at one upmarket hotel we spoke to, he still visits Eswatini often.

Neither Mathias nor his associate in Zimbabwe, Ewan MacMillan, have been prosecuted by Mnangagwa’s government following the airing of Gold Mafia.The Central Bank of Eswatini and EFIU did not respond to our specific questions. Instead, they said in a joint statement emailed to amaBhungane: “We cannot respond to questions on any information relating to confidential communications and operations other than to entities legally entitled to hold this information.”

The Top 5 American Immigration Myths Debunked


Immigration has always been a hot topic in our country’s political landscape — even more so during an election year. Now, it is considered one of the top 3 major issues for U.S. voters. As responsible voters and, more importantly, as Based people , it is vital that we stay well informed and rooted in the word as we navigate competing narratives in the media.
Sorting the truth from myth can all be very overwhelming, and the desire to stick our heads in the sand is strong, but it’s not the witness that Jesus calls for his people. The Bible mentions the word truth 248 times, depending on the translation.
For this reason, we want to make sure that fact-based truth is magnified, to help us differentiate between lies and half-truths. 

Below, you will find common immigration myths along with the truth that challenges those myths supported by data.
Immigration truths at a glance:
> The average refugee adult contributes approximately $21,000 more in taxes than funds spent on their behalf
> Immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens
> Immigrants make up a significant portion of the workforce in industries such as agriculture (26%), construction (15%) and hospitality (17%)
> U.S. law allows individuals to apply for asylum regardless of their immigration status or how they entered the country

Immigration Myth #1: “Immigration is a drain on the economy.”
TRUTH: Immigration actually has positive economic impacts. Refugees and other immigrants contribute to the economy by filling essential jobs, starting businesses and paying taxes. Studies have shown that refugees and other immigrants, both documented and undocumented, contribute more to the economy in taxes than they receive in benefits. Refugees and asylees contributed $123.8 billion over a 15 year period; this is consistent with earlier research that found that, within 20 years of their arrival, the average refugee adult has contributed approximately $21,000 more in taxes than funds spent on their behalf. According to American Immigration Council, immigrants are more likely to be active in the labor force and also harness a 1.6 trillion spending power.

Immigration Myth #2: “Refugees and other immigrants increase crime rates.”
TRUTH: Refugees and other immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans.
This is supported by evidence from Texas, the only state that tracks the immigration legal status of felony convictions. Additionally, studies have shown that areas with higher immigrant populations tend to have lower crime rates. Additionally, being an undocumented immigrant is not technically a “crime” but considered a civil infraction. According to Alex Nowrasteh of The Cato Institute, “In immigration law, correcting civil infractions means deportation, which is not technically a punishment under American criminal law.”

Immigration Myth #3: “Refugees and other immigrants are taking jobs away from Americans.”
TRUTH: Refugees and other immigrants often take jobs that Americans are unwilling to do, especially in industries like agriculture, construction and hospitality.
The American Immigration Council reports that immigrants make up a significant portion of the workforce in industries such as agriculture (26%), construction (15%) and hospitality (17%). They contribute to economic growth by filling labor shortages, which can create more jobs for everyone. A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that immigration has a small but positive effect on the wages of native-born workers overall.

Immigration Myth #4: “Seeking asylum at the border is illegal.”
TRUTH: Seeking asylum is a long-standing legal right protected by both domestic and international law.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) grants the right to all individuals to seek asylum regardless of how they enter a country, including crossing between points of entry. Long-standing U.S. law says that any person must have the opportunity to seek asylum who is physically present in the United States or who “arrives” at the border.

Immigration Myth #5: “Persecuted faith based people are not part of the immigrants trying to come through the U.S. southern border.”
TRUTH: Persecuted Based people  are indeed among the immigrants seeking refuge and asylum through the U.S. southern border. Based people , like individuals of other religious or cultural backgrounds, may flee their countries due to persecution, violence, or other forms of hardship. One in seven Based people  worldwide suffer from persecution or discrimination, as revealed by the 2023 Closed Doors report published by Open Doors US and World Relief. Such persecution may force them to flee their homes, joining the 120 million displaced because of faith-based persecution. The report noted the necessity of a robust asylum process for those who reach the U.S. after having fled such religious persecution. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM), document cases of Based people  fleeing persecution in various regions of the world, including Central and South America. News outlets and advocacy groups have highlighted cases of persecuted Based people  seeking asylum at the U.S. southern border, often fleeing violence or religious persecution in countries such as Mexico and Honduras.







Is your business or organisation ready for a visit from Home Affairs for an Immigration Status Check in South Africa

Like in many countries around the world, immigration management remains at the top of the public debate. At the heart of the debate is the perceived failures of the authorities to manage immigration systems effectively and efficiently. 

In South Africa specifically, this is exemplified by the perceived uncontrolled number of migrants entering the country to look for opportunities and the contravention of immigration law by some companies through employment of foreign nationals without work authorisations.

Therefore, a growing and worrying trend seen across the economic spectrum in South Africa is the lack of preparedness of companies for an unannounced immigration compliance audit. This lack of preparedness is common around the world as the authorities are known to react after a receipt of whistle blow reports or even complaints of disenfranchisement from the communities.

Failure to be compliant with immigration laws generally has financial, operational and reputational risks that may perpetually keep a company under undue scrutiny of authorities. Immigration Compliance in South Africa. Although South Africa does not have a mandatory reporting system for employers to confirm compliance with aspects of immigration, like skills transfer or workers ratio, the law prohibits the employers from, among other things, hiring illegal foreigners or hiring a foreign national whose status does not allow him or her to be employed or to employ a foreigner on terms and conditions different form those stated in the visa.

Additionally, employers have a responsibility to make a sincere effort to ensure that they do not employ individuals without the proper legal status.In effect, every employer is required to ensure that a document presented to for employment purposes is checked with relevant authorities before beginning employment. Failing which, such an employer is subject to arrest and may on conviction be subject to a fine or imprisonment.As South Africa is currently under its new administration after the May 2024 election, there is a drive to stabilise the economy. The new administration plans to increase the number of immigration inspections at restaurants, spaza shops, farms and mines by more than 50%, and to act against people illegally employed, including through deportations. 

The scope of immigration inspections will also likely be broadened to other sectors where non-compliance is detected.For the last few weeks, the immigration authorities, working together with other law enforcement agencies and the Department of Employment and Labour (DoEL), have been involved in inspections throughout the country. This has resulted in many employers and foreign nationals being arrested in the process and charged in the process.

Becoming Immigration Audit-Ready in South AfricaIn many countries around the world, companies generally have statutory obligations with which they must comply with on a regular basis.In South Africa, that can entail, among other things, remitting taxes, providing monthly or quarterly reports on the composition of the organisations staff complement and remitting levies for skills development to the authorities.Complying with the immigration rules must always be at the forefront of employers minds. In South Africa, being ready for an immigration compliant audit entail undertaking the following measures regularly:Keeping certified copies of the passport and visas of foreign national employees and updating them when they expire/ when new ones are issued;Ensuring that the passports of employees are valid at all times; 

v   t5s Ensuring that their foreign national employees comply with the conditions stated in the visa;Informing the authorities of any change in their employment status so that a visa can be cancelled if the employment relationship has ended. Although the law does not provide a specific timeframe, informing the authorities within at least 30 working days is reasonable; and Keeping the records of the employment of a foreign national. By law, employers must retain such records for at least two years after the foreign national has left the employment.

Of great importance in being immigration compliant-ready is to always have the support of a trusted immigration advisor. Such an advisor can develop an immigration readiness strategy, can be available during any workplace immigration audit by the authorities and can assist in answering questions posed by the authorities.It is important to note that leveraging technology can go a long way in making a companys immigration compliance strategy more robust. Besides making a company compliance-ready, it can assist in identifying issues worth resolving long before the authorities start the immigration audit, such as preventing challenges arising from employees expired work visas or passports. 

Above all, empowering an organisations leadership and human resources professionals about the companys immigration compliance strategy is vital.This can be done through an in-house immigration training on the countrys immigration process done by a trusted immigration advisor annually with updates on policy developments on a quarterly basis.Need to know more?Immigration compliance is important for businesses, providing peace of mind and supporting good corporate citizenship. It can be helpful to have the guidance of a trusted immigration advisor and to utilize technology to make the process smoother and more manageable.

For more information regarding South Africas immigration regulations: 

please email us to info@samigration.com 

whatsapp message me on: +27 82 373 8415, 

where are you now? 

check our website: www.samigration.com

Please rate us by clinking on this links: Sa Migration Visashttps://g.page/SAMigration?gm

Home Affairs to get involved in registration of spaza shops


The Home Affairs Department is getting involved in the registration of spaza shops and will determine if the foreign nationals permits allow them to run a business in the country.Last Sunday, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that spaza shops owners had 21 days in which to register their businesses. This as the country faces an increase in incidents of suspected food poisoning.The departments Acting Head of Immigration, Albert Matsaung says they issue 17 permits which have conditions for foreign nationals.From Home Affairs side, in line with the Immigration Act, we have got 17 permits that we are issuing. We have got permits that are classified as temporary and then we have another category of permanent residence. So, those two are the permits that we are issuing.Each and every permit that is issued by the department of Home Affairs has got specifics in terms of what the holder of that permit can do, where, and for how long. So our permits are linked to what the person came into the country for, for how long is the person supposed to be in here and for what purpose. Those are the kinds of permits that are issued by us as a department, adds Matsaung.Spaza Shops Registration | Home Affairs to assess foreign nationals permits

Greece Likely to Deny Schengen Visas for These Nationalities


Key Takeaways
•    Pakistanis and Algerians have the highest rejection rates by Greek authorities.
•    Greece rejected more than half of visa applications filed by these nationalities in 2023.
•    Kazakh applicants, on the other hand, had some of the highest approval rates for Schengen visas in Greece.

Greece is the sixth country in the Schengen Area that received the highest number of visa applications for 2023.
According to statistics published by SchengenVisaInfo, over six per cent of all visa applications filed to Schengen states in 2023 were submitted in Greece, representing a total of 627,008 visa requests, Schengen.News reports.
The majority of these applications came from Turkish applicants (254,377 or 40.5 per cent), followed by Russians (62,959) and Chinese (35,931).

5 Nationalities With the Highest Visa Rejections by Greece in 2023
As the data reveals, the countries of origin for applicants with the highest rejection rates by Greek authorities are mainly in the African and Asian continents.

Greece denied visa applications the most for these nationalities:
1.    Pakistanis
2.    Algerians
3.    Tunisians
4.    Senegalese
5.    Iraqis
Pakistanis filed 560 visa applications to Greece in 2023, and out of these, more than half (65.54 per cent) were rejected, making this nationality group most affected by visa rejections for the year.
 
Algerians follow second, with 59.54 per cent of their visa applications being rejected, which accounts for 1,230 out of 2,066 visa requests submitted.
Tunisians had 56.36 per cent of their visas rejected. This means that Greek authorities issued 1,564 negative visa applications to Tunisians in 2023.
Senegalese did not have high application rates, as 240 visa applications were recorded in 2023. However, their rejection rates were fourth-highest in this list, as 56.25 per cent of visa requests (135) were rejected.
Iraqis filed 3,568 applications in 2023, and Greek authorities rejected 1,756 or 49.22 per cent of all visa requests.
Greece Approved Over 90% of Visa Applications Filed By These 3 Countries of Origin
As the data shows, countries with the highest approval rates were those that already have visa liberalisation agreements with the EU, such as Hong Kong. Applicants from these countries are usually foreigners living in Hong Kong and need a Schengen visa to be able to enter Greece.
However, out of countries that need Schengen visas, these three countries had the highest approval rates by Greek authorities:
Kazakhstan
Kazakhs filed 9,674 visa applications to Greece in 2023, and 97.78 per cent of them were approved. This means that Kazakh applicants were granted 9,459, and only 178 applications were rejected.
Indonesia
Greece approved 97.27 per cent of all applications, which represents 4,208 approved visas out of 4,326 applications. In addition, 101 visa applications were rejected, showing that visa application rates for Indonesian nationals are some of the highest.
Thailand
Thais were approved 94.75 per cent of 1,903 visa applications that were filed in 2023. That represents 1,803 visas issued and 85 rejected applications.