|
|
Home Affairs officials are “selling South Africa to foreign nationals” out of greed, says Minister Aaron Motsoaledi. In an exclusive interview with The Witness on Thursday, Motsoaledi said 182 department officials were dismissed for fraud and corruption between 2018 and 2024. Among those dismissed was a chief director who was implicated in assisting a foreign national in getting a permanent residence permit in the country, at a fee. Those who bear the brunt of the corruption are mostly drug addicts, whose personal information is used by Home Affairs officials to create fake IDs and passports for foreigners. Motsoaledi was commenting on the recent arrest of a Pietermaritzburg department employee by the Hawks for allegedly selling passports to foreigners. The man, according to Hawks provincial spokesperson Simphiwe Mhlongo, has since appeared at the Durban Commercial Crimes Court and was remanded in custody until Monday. Selling identity documents and passports is quite big in SA because the country is in demand. Many people around the world want to come to SA. They are prepared to pay money to get those documents. Even rich foreign people from unstable countries are prepared to get citizenship illegally. To mitigate the problem, Motsoaledi said the department has a counter corruption unit, which is headed by the department’s deputy director general. The unit comprises, among others, officers who have worked for the Hawks and are employed for their experience. “If they have 10 foreigners, these crooked officials will round up 10 SA nyaope (drug) addicts and go to a Home Affairs office at night, depending on the area they are based in, and process the documents. “Every detail of the addict will be accessed and when it comes to the photo, the foreign national will be the one who poses for the photo and in that manner, the SA citizen has lost his identity to the foreigner. This damages our citizens’ livelihoods because at a later stage the locals will realise that they do not exist in our system. Their names are there, but a different person has taken the identity. He said this was a lucrative business for unscrupulous employees, as among those who were dismissed were post-level 6 employees. “They perform clerical tasks but they own more than one luxury vehicle and you ask yourself: where do they get the money to afford such a wealthy lifestyle? It’s through selling their country to foreigners. We are clamping down on them and we have pending court cases and disciplinary proceedings,” Motsoaledi said. The Witness reported last month that a multi-disciplinary task team comprising the Mountain Rise police station, a community policing forum, a security company, and immigration officers swooped on a flat in Raisethorpe, where a sophisticated syndicate of undocumented immigrants was arrested. The syndicate was illegally producing fake identity documents, bank and fuel cards, passports and driving licences. While conducting a search of the flat after arresting the undocumented immigrants, officers discovered a locked room that contained about 300 bank cards from various financial institutions, 20 cellphones that were used to transact from some of those bank accounts, printing equipment commonly used for forgery, and fraudulent driving licences, identity documents, visas, and passports. Opposition parties in parliament were scathing of the department’s system. DA Shadow Minister of Home Affairs and parliamentarian, Angel Khanyile said the greed displayed by some Home Affairs officials was equivalent to selling the country to foreigners. This removes SA citizens from the national population register and also erases fingerprints, which results in locals being declared non-existent in the system. “Dismissing rogue elements is not enough because it’s a long process before the victims get their documents back. Since department employees use biometric systems to access information from computers, it therefore should be easy to catch the corrupt individuals.” IFP’s Liezl Van Der Merwe said the department was riddled with corruption, infiltrated by syndicates, and that the immigration system had collapsed. Our position with regards to the immigration crisis is that all foreign nationals who have South African documents, whether IDs, passports or permits, should have these revalidated. “Our manifesto proposes a six-month amnesty period wherein all foreign nationals should come forward to revalidate their permits and regularise their stay. This will allow us to root out all fake documentation or documentation obtained fraudulently,” said Van Der Merwe. |
Recently settled case in the Labour Court demonstrated that excluding a job applicant because of their criminal record is only lawful when the requirements of that job explicitly outline and justify the need for a clean criminal record.
However, legal experts say that the court’s decision ultimately delinked trust and honesty from the inherent requirements of a job, which was “concerning.”
ENS Africa’s Nils Braatvedt, Kim Vova, and Lutho Zono examined the background, outcome, and subsequent analysis of the recent court ruling in O’Connor v LexisNexis.
The experts said that “this decision emphasises the risk of automatically excluding applicants from employment based on an inherent trait such as a criminal record.”
Background
O’Connor [first name omitted] applied for a senior data expert role at LexisNexis. As part of the recruitment process, the company required applicants to declare whether they had ever been criminally charged.
Acknowledging his past theft conviction from 2001 had been expunged, O’Connor was initially offered a job by LexisNexis based on the outcome of a background check.
LexisNexis withdrew their job offer following the check, which unveiled six theft charges, one fraud charge, and two charges of obstructing justice.
Aggrieved at this decision and after unsuccessfully attempting to settle the dispute at the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), O’Connor approached the Labour Court.
He alleged that LexisNexis unfairly discriminated against him based on his past criminal convictions, basing the argument on a section of the Employment Equity Act that prohibits “unfair discrimination” in any employment policy or practice.
Court ruling
In considering whether O’Connor had been unfairly discriminated against, the court assessed whether the differentiation based on a criminal record was ” arbitrary.”
The court found that having a criminal record is an inherent attribute that is connected to how a person is viewed in society. Additionally, the court said that the idea behind criminal justice in South Africa is that once a criminal have paid their debt to society, that person must be allowed back into society.
“Accordingly, the Labour Court found that differentiation on the basis of a criminal record is an arbitrary ground as contemplated in section 6 of the EEA,” said Braatvedt, Vova, and Zono.
Additionally, the court had to ascertain whether discrimination was justifiable on the basis that it was an inherent requirement of the job for O’Connor to have a clean criminal record.
The court reached the conclusion that the position did “not require a significant amount of trust and honesty”, where the possibility of O’Connor’s rehabilitation should be completely disregarded.
It, therefore, found that LexisNexis did not demonstrate that a clean criminal record was an inherent requirement for the role and ordered that it would be just and equitable for LexisNexis to employ Mr O’Connor in the role.
Legal Commentary
“What is perhaps concerning about the Court’s decision is the delinking of trust and honesty from the inherent requirements of a job,” said the ENS experts.
The ultimate decision was influenced by LexisNexis’ inadequate response to the claim’s core issues, with the court suggesting a different outcome had they engaged with the allegations.
However, the legal experts said that “the decision seems to contradict the common law principle that there is a reciprocal duty of good faith which obliges an employee to perform work in a trustworthy and honest manner indeed, trust underpins the employment relationship.”
“Insofar as the Court found that Mr O’Connor’s role did not require a significant amount of trust, there is either trust, or there is not an employer cannot be expected to tolerate a degree of untrustworthiness or dishonesty regardless of how clerical or geographically distinct an employee’s work may be,” they added.
The ENS experts said that, in their view, the enquiry should have started with the assumption that trust and honesty are essential for any job, and the key question should have rather been how a 20-year-old criminal conviction affects an employer’s trust in the applicant.
Things to note going forward
“Employers should bear in mind that excluding an applicant because of their criminal record is only lawful when the inherent requirements of the job legitimately require a clean criminal record,” said the experts.
A noteworthy part of this case involves O’Connor’s upfront disclosure of his criminal history, showing “a degree of honesty” despite potential employment consequences.
“Employees who refuse to disclose their criminal convictions when they have been asked to do so could be guilty of misconduct,” said Braatvedt, Vova, and Zono.
The City of Cape Town has slammed the Department of Home Affairs for creating confusion and continuing to score “infuriating” own goals in launching remote work visas in the country.
Mayoral committee member for economic growth, James Vos, said that the last month has seen the department shoot itself in the foot with the premature gazetting and subsequent withdrawal of regulations that would create this category of visa.
“On 28 March, the DHA published the amended immigration regulations. This, however, was a day before the closing date of the public comment period. And then, on 12 April, the minister issued a notice withdrawing the 28 March amendments,” Vos said.
Among other things, the regulations replaced the highly-contested critical skills list with a new points-based system and introduced the remote work visa class. At the time of the withdrawal, the minister said that the regulations would be revised within a week, but has since fallen silent.
“South Africa’s visa system is already infamously a mess and this latest bungle only serves as a reminder of the murk. The hundreds of thousands of employees working in the tourism industry, not to mention those in need of jobs, can ill afford yet more chaos caused by the department.”
Vos said that the tourism industry and businesses need urgent clarity on the status of the remote-worker visas. The delays could cost the country millions of rands of additional tourist spend.
“Businesses in countless more industries are equally frustrated as the skilled staff they need are unable to get into the country due to unprocessed visas,” he said.
The MEC said that businesses in industries like business process outsourcing have complained about the current visa system hindering expansion and skills transfer, while others have flagged challenges acquiring visas for delegates, forcing the relocation of conferences and events to other parts of Africa.
Vos urged the department to provide a detailed plan to address the crisis of the visa system and adhere to that plan.
Cape Town has been a major proponent of the remote-work visa, saying that it is in a prime position to benefit economically.
“A fully functioning visa system would be a boon to our country’s economy, driving investments and jobs for millions of desperate South Africans. I urge President Cyril Ramaphosa to exert pressure on the department to get this done,” he said.
The City of Cape Town has slammed the Department of Home Affairs for creating confusion and continuing to score “infuriating” own goals in launching remote work visas in the country.
Mayoral committee member for economic growth, James Vos, said that the last month has seen the department shoot itself in the foot with the premature gazetting and subsequent withdrawal of regulations that would create this category of visa.
“On 28 March, the DHA published the amended immigration regulations. This, however, was a day before the closing date of the public comment period. And then, on 12 April, the minister issued a notice withdrawing the 28 March amendments,” Vos said.
Among other things, the regulations replaced the highly-contested critical skills list with a new points-based system and introduced the remote work visa class. At the time of the withdrawal, the minister said that the regulations would be revised within a week, but has since fallen silent.
“South Africa’s visa system is already infamously a mess and this latest bungle only serves as a reminder of the murk. The hundreds of thousands of employees working in the tourism industry, not to mention those in need of jobs, can ill afford yet more chaos caused by the department.”
Vos said that the tourism industry and businesses need urgent clarity on the status of the remote-worker visas. The delays could cost the country millions of rands of additional tourist spend.
“Businesses in countless more industries are equally frustrated as the skilled staff they need are unable to get into the country due to unprocessed visas,” he said.
The MEC said that businesses in industries like business process outsourcing have complained about the current visa system hindering expansion and skills transfer, while others have flagged challenges acquiring visas for delegates, forcing the relocation of conferences and events to other parts of Africa.
Vos urged the department to provide a detailed plan to address the crisis of the visa system and adhere to that plan.
Cape Town has been a major proponent of the remote-work visa, saying that it is in a prime position to benefit economically.
“A fully functioning visa system would be a boon to our country’s economy, driving investments and jobs for millions of desperate South Africans. I urge President Cyril Ramaphosa to exert pressure on the department to get this done,” he said.