South Africa’s vaccine passport: Have jab, can travel, except to the UK and US

South Africa’s vaccine passport: Have jab, can travel, except to the UK and US

Daily Maverick  - 18 September 2021

Anger as United Kingdom keeps South Africa on red status despite government lobbying.

Britain’s decision to leave South Africa on its Covid-19 red list of countries from which citizens may not enter the UK – while removing eight other countries from the list – has caused outrage.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps announced on Friday night that his government was removing Turkey, Pakistan, the Maldives, Egypt, Sri Lanka, Oman, Bangladesh and Kenya from the list and simplifying procedures for foreigners to enter. But SA stayed on the list despite furious campaigning by Pretoria and business to get it off.

David Frost, CEO of Satsa, who has been leading the campaign, told DM168 on Friday that Shapps’ decision was “scandalous and completely unacceptable”. Frost said the decision was based on obsolete Covid-19 infection data and bad interpretation of the science.

He said Shapps seemed to have based his decision on his well-known insistence that the Beta variant largely emanates from South Africa, which was anachronistic information dating from last December.

“We would want to know how Kenya was taken off the list. We know their genomic sequencing is just about nonexistent compared to ours. We do the good science,” Frost said, adding that he believed South Africa was unfairly paying the price for that science.

Elsewhere Covid-19 vaccinations are becoming health passports for South African tourists to other holiday destinations such as France, Germany, Switzerland and Greece. But the UK – the biggest source of inbound tourists – and the US remain shut to South African tourists and their own returning nationals. Britons who travel to SA have to endure 10 days of quarantine on their return, which has effectively killed the market, and is costing SA about R26-million a day, the tourist industry says.

The loss of British tourism has already cost SA R2.4-billion in lost revenue since it was put on the list in May, according to the World Travel & Tourism Council. The UK has traditionally been SA’s biggest source market for tourists. More than 430,000 British travellers arrived in SA in 2019.  During the complete shutdown of international travel from April to December 2020, UK arrivals dropped by 97%.

International Relations and Cooperation Minister Naledi Pandor joined in the campaign to persuade Britain to take SA off the red list. This week she raised the issue again with the new British Foreign Secretary Elizabeth Truss at a closed online meeting of Commonwealth foreign ministers, said Pandor’s spokesperson, Lunga Ngqengelele.

“She raises it at every opportunity,” he said. The minister did this on behalf of SA and the many other African countries on the red list.

Pandor told Radio 702 this week: “South Africa has made good progress through the third wave and its health system has shown that it is able to cope with the challenge. We are relaying this to our counterparts in the UK and we hope that very soon sense will prevail.

“South Africa is a major destination for tourists from the UK and for tourists from South Africa to the UK. I think there is a lot of protest arriving at the table of the Prime Minister as well as the Secretary of State,” Pandor added.

Frost told DM168 that SA is being punished in part because its good Covid-19 scientists made discoveries that are not being properly interpreted to the world. He is furious about reports that SA could become a Covid-19 “mutation factory”. The reports arise from the work of bioinformatics professor Tulio de Oliveira, who runs gene-sequencing programmes at two South African universities.

He told an immunology conference on 30 August that South Africa’s 8.2 million HIV-positive people were immune-compromised and therefore able to harbour the coronavirus for longer, allowing it to mutate as it reproduced.

“You have this massive virus evolution, really the virus accumulating over 30 mutations,” De Oliveira was quoted as saying. Frost said this message was amplified in the UK and elsewhere and was being taken up by British “hawks” trying to keep SA on the red list. He believes that many uncontextualised interpretations of the scientific position in SA are being used against the country.

The evidence clearly points to South Africa being removed from the red list. If the UK government wants to retain the integrity of its traffic light system, it must reward countries which empirically demonstrate they are safe by granting them amber status.

He noted that the UK imposed its outright ban on SA in December after SA had detected the Beta variant of Covid-19, as though that was about to take over the world. Since then, the Delta variant has completely overtaken the Beta variant and is also dominant in the UK.

Frost pointed out that SA’s average number of daily new Covid-19 infections had halved over the past two weeks. Its infection rate is less than a quarter of the UK’s and lower than most EU countries on the UK’s amber list (which allows entry to tourists but with quarantines).

Frost said calls were mounting in the UK for South Africa to be removed from the list. For example, in the Independent, in a joint statement on behalf of the South African tourism industry, Ben Bradshaw MP, Lord Oates and Baroness Chalker said: “The evidence clearly points to South Africa being removed from the red list. If the UK government wants to retain the integrity of its traffic light system, it must reward countries which empirically demonstrate they are safe by granting them amber status.”

Frost noted that aggressive lobbying, in a big  government campaign, got India off the list. The South African government, in tandem with business organisations like his and Business Leadership South Africa, had gone in to bat for SA, but much more was needed.

The UK and US increasingly look out of step as other tourist destinations rapidly open up to vaccinated South Africans. France, Germany, Ireland, Switzerland, Spain and Greece are among European countries that recently dropped quarantine requirements and opened their doors to South African tourists who have been vaccinated. Others are expected to follow soon.

Yet China, Russia, India, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Turkey and others are allowing entry to South African tourists only if they endure long and often expensive quarantine periods.

A South African woman who holds a British passport and had to return to the UK to visit her elderly mother described the costs, inconvenience and confusion of navigating the UK’s Covid-19 regulations and restrictions.

She had to book a package in advance that included  10 nights in a quarantine hotel, with three meals a day, and two PCR tests, for a total of about R35,000. The price was fixed and she had no choice of hotel. When she arrived at Heathrow Airport she and the other travellers from SA were directed to Terminal 5, which was dedicated to processing arrivals from red list countries. From there the travellers were entirely in the hands of officials who transported them to their hotels and kept them under effective guard there.

Their meals were brought to their rooms, which they could not leave, apart from short periods of exercise in the hotel parking lot. If they needed to leave their rooms for any other reason, they could only do so with permission – and under guard.

The United States is also still barring entry of South African tourists, though other categories of traveller may be permitted if the US deems this to be “in the national interest”. South Africa is on a list of 33 forbidden source countries, which includes all those in Europe’s Schengen area, as well as the UK, Ireland, Brazil, China, India and Iran.

Numbers of tourists moving between South Africa and those European countries opening up to vaccinated South Africans have slowly started to pick up, according to a Johannesburg-based travel agent.

And some South African tourists visiting those countries are using them as a back door to other European members of the Schengen visa regime that are not yet open to South Africans, like the Netherlands and Italy, diplomatic sources told DM168. This is because no immigration restrictions apply between Schengen countries.

The Johannesburg travel agent said that Schengen-area immigration officials were starting to get wise to this and demanding proof of the departure country of travellers across Schengen borders.

A diplomatic source said that South Africans travelling to France should also take care to register for the Passe Sanitaire, which certifies their vaccination status and is required for entry to restaurants, planes and regional trains, as well as all venues accommodating 50 people or more. This pass is an App with a QR code.

Other European countries have equivalents.

The agent also pointed out the hazards that shifting red list restrictions presented to travellers to destinations such as the UK. Some travellers are choosing to do their quarantines in other countries, such as in Ireland, before entering the UK. The Johannesburg travel agent told DM168 that, because of the uncertainties and variations of travel to Europe, many South Africans are instead choosing to holiday in Africa. Egypt requires only a recent negative Covid-19 PCR test, as do most countries closer to home, such as Zimbabwe, Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Eswatini, Mozambique and Ethiopia.

This week the Seychelles took South Africa off its restricted list, meaning South Africans may visit the archipelago with only a recent negative PCR test certificate. Mauritius will take South Africa off its restricted list on 1 October. Vaccinated travellers will be allowed to roam freely across the island immediately. Those without vaccinations will still have to undergo quarantine in an official quarantine hotel for 14 days.

www.samigration.com

 


More bank branches to offer Home Affairs services in South Africa

More bank branches to offer Home Affairs services in South Africa

News24 -  September 2021

The Department of Home Affairs plans to expand its partnership with banks to offer more services at branches across the country.

In a presentation to parliament on Tuesday (31 August), the department said that there are currently 27 bank branches that offer E-Home Affairs services across six different provinces.

The department said it plans to roll out these services to a further 43 sites in the near future.

“This initiative was done mainly to assist with the reduction of long queues at DHA offices and to expand the service platforms and allow citizens to apply for Smart ID cards and passports online.

“Applicants are only required to visit the bank branch to complete the biometrics, thereby reducing the time spent in the bank or DHA office.”

The department said that the rollout of pilot sites will be completed as soon as possible as this has been outstanding for a number of years.

All of South Africa’s biggest banks – with the exception of Capitec – offer the E-Home Affairs service at a handful of their branches.

Absa, FNB, Nedbank, and Standard Bank have had multiple branches supporting the service for several years. Discovery Bank and Investec Bank recently started participating in the programme with one branch each.

The tables below show all of the bank branches where you can book appointments to capture biometric data for your smart ID and passport application, and collect your documents when they are ready.

www.samigration.com


Home Affairs offices open over the weekend

Home Affairs offices open over the weekend

Enca - 17 September 2021

Long queues and systems that are constantly offline have long plagued Home Affairs offices. It's affected many people. Home Affairs says it will be using this weekend to resolve issues just like these. Reporter Mawande Kheswa has more. Courtesy #DStv403

There are over 400,000 uncollected IDs at Home Affairs offices nationwide.

For those without these documents, there will be no way to register to vote this weekend.

Home Affairs offices will be open this weekend from 8am to 5pm to help.

“We are going to be open over the weekend so that all those who want to come and collect their ID’s they can be able to do so," said Njabulo Nzuza, Deputy Home Affairs Minister.

"Those who want to have their temporary Identity documents can also come through. Those who are having extreme case issues where they need certain things fixed on their ID’s can also come through to resolve those errors where you have duplicates and so on."

www.samigration.com


Artisans now required to register before applying for visa.

National Register of Artisans now in effect

   Hi artisan,

Applying for critical skills work visa in South Africa as an artisan has been a challenge for the longest time. In 2014 when the current amendments to the Immigration Act were gazetted several gaps were identified in the Act which included the absence of a SAQA accredited professional body to register artisans. ECSA was not an option due to their minimum NQF criteria of 5 which was a notch above the rating being given by SAQA for artisans.  There was a time letters issued by the National Artisan Moderation Body, (NAMB), were sufficient and then they were not. There was a time when registration with the South African Institute of Draughting was good enough and then it wasn’t. The latest dispensation saw applications being rejected because Home Affairs required a South African trade test.  This of course is absurd for two reasons; the artisan is already trade tested and secondly a South African  

This inconsistency was a direct result of the absence of a key legislative instrument, namely the National Register of Artisans.  In terms section 26C of the Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 as amended, the Minister of Higher Education is required to establish a register of artisans.  This register unfortunately could not be implemented as the regulations were not yet in place to establish this register, therefore the NAMB letters were acceptable as they pointed to the absence of the National Register of Artisans.  In the absence of a clear framework on how to recognize foreign artisans in the republic it meant that the Department of Home Affairs was left to its own devices hence the constant changes in approach.

Fortunately, that gap has now been closed and a clear process of registering artisans is now in place.   The National Register of Artisans Regulations was gazetted the 19th of March 2021 and provides a framework for the registration of all artisans, local and foreign. There 4 categories of artisans, Practicing Artisans, Non – Practicing, Foreign Practicing and Foreign Non-Practicing Artisans.  Under regulation 3 it is mandatory for all artisans to register with the Department of Higher Educations National Artisan Development Support Centre (NADSC). 

The registration requirements for foreign National Practicing Artisans are the following, a certified passport copy, evidence of legal visa for entrance into the country, certified copy of trade test whether conducted locally or abroad, SAQA evaluation of foreign trade test, proof of address and proof of previous registration for a renewal.

Importantly regulation 6 has some consequences for visa applications by artisans.  6.5 Provides that all foreign national artisans must register with DHET before applying for critical skills work visa or any work visa with DHA. 6.6 goes on to state that foreign national artisans will not be granted critical skills work by DHA if they are not registered with DHET. This means that as of 19th March 2021 it became impossible for an artisan to get a visa without first registering the NADSC

 


Home Affairs: The long and winding road to holding public service officials accountable

Home Affairs: The long and winding road to holding public service officials accountable

Daily Maverick -  7 September 2021

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has written to his Cabinet colleague, Arts and Culture Minister Nathi Mthethwa, asking him to take disciplinary action against his director-general, a former Home Affairs official linked to the Gupta naturalisation saga.

The Home Affairs minister has tried to make it easy for the arts and culture minister by even supplying the recommended charges. “You don’t escape disciplinary proceedings by going to different departments,” Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi told MPs on Tuesday.

Disciplinary steps against officials who had failed to do due diligence and verify the accuracy of information on which the 2015 early naturalisation to Ajay Gupta and family were part of the remedial actions, according to the Public Protector report published on 7 February 2021.

Malusi Gigaba, home affairs minister at the time, was cleared of abusing his statutory discretion to grant early naturalisation – the focus fell on officials – but he was busted for failing to table the names in Parliament as is required by law.

No names were mentioned during Tuesday’s parliamentary home affairs committee meeting, but the ministerial reference to the director-general was clear, as was the Public Protector report that named former home affairs director-general, now Arts and Culture Director-General Vusumuzi Mkhize, as being among a handful of officials involved in the Gupta naturalisation debacle. 

Mkhize remains in the top echelon of the public service – unlike former home affairs DG Mkuseli Apleni, who in July 2018 left for the private sector.

“We have started disciplinary proceedings against officials named in the Public Protector report. One of the officials is deceased,” Home Affairs Director-General Tommy Makhode confirmed to MPs. “We are on course to finalise that matter.”

The relevant officials had been approached for their responses to the Public Protector report and its recommendations for remedial action. And Home Affairs is getting assistance with the chairperson and initiator for the proceedings from the office of the State Attorney as “some of the people involved are SMS [senior management service]”. 

Later, Motsoaledi reconfirmed the suspension of five officials over the irregular residence permits issued to Pastor Shepherd Bushiri and his family. This came to light after he skipped bail in a R100-million-plus money laundering case and fled to Malawi.

No permanent residence permit applications have been processed since March 2020 when the Covid-19 State of Disaster was first declared. In June 2021, Motsoaledi gazetted that the processing of applications would resume on 1 January 2022. 

Daily Maverick has reported that this suspension has left ordinary permanent residence applicants in limbo, with their daily lives being severely affected..

The backlog in applications stands at 33,700, according to Home Affairs, and pressure is on as the Presidency has prioritised a policy and regulatory review for skilled immigration.

On Tuesday it emerged that, aside from this regulatory and policy review that brings together Home Affairs, Labour and Employment, Trade, Industry and Innovation and Higher Education, Motsoaledi has established a review of permits issued since 2004. 

“We are looking into everything that is a permit since 2004,” said Motsoaledi, listing permanent resident permits, “corporate permits, especially in mining”, study permits, business visas and retirement visas.

This task team is headed by former Presidency DG Cassius Lubisi and is expected to submit its report by the end of 2021.

This comes on the back of a whole host of legislative reviews and potential changes which ultimately could include a one-stop law to encompass civics like IDs, births, marriages and death certificates, immigration matters like visas and permanent residency and refugee affairs.

It looks increasingly implausible for Parliament to meet the Constitutional Court’s June 2022 deadline for the new electoral law. The average time Parliament takes to adopt a law is two years.  

Closer at hand is legal advice on how to deal with the ministerial discretion to grant early naturalisation in exceptional circumstances. The Public Protector’s remedial action proposed “A descriptive framework for ‘exceptional circumstances’, which does not encroach on the minister’s discretion, but allows for a guideline to facilitate a fair and uniform approach”.

Motsoaledi told MPs the matter was still with the legal unit, and he anticipated that “when it comes back from the legal unit, it’s just my gut feeling, their advice will be to amend” that section of the Immigration Act.

All that is a lot going on.

As part of the Jacob Zuma administration’s legacy, Home Affairs since 2017 is part of the security cluster in government, alongside defence, police and state security. The decision to shift Home Affairs out of the governance Cabinet cluster was taken in 2016, as a Cabinet statement on 1 March 2017 reaffirmed Home Affairs’ repositioning “within the security system of the state so that it contributes to national security…”

In 2017 Home Affairs released a 31-page discussion paper which weaves together national security, the authority of the state, managing identity and matters economic – including the department raising its own funds by leveraging, for example, identity verification services.

On Tuesday Motsoaledi confirmed Home Affairs as central to the security cluster during the briefing to MPs on what the department calls counter-corruption and security, effectively anti-corruption measures that includes working with police and Hawks to bust syndicates.

“If anything goes wrong in Home Affairs, the whole country is lost,” the minister said. “The security services depend on Home Affairs to do their work. The lawyers depend on Home Affairs to do their work… The university and the schools, they all depend on Home Affairs.”

In his briefing to MPs, the minister seemed to let off some steam over the slow pace of disciplinary proceedings, light penalties, recourse to courts and the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) – and how public servants seemed to protect each other in disciplinary proceedings.

Because in disciplinary proceedings civil servants were “prone to making each other favours”, Motsoaledi said he welcomed Public Service and Administration putting together a panel of retired judges for disciplinary hearings. “There’s no chance of anyone trying to bribe them.”

The CCMA also seemed to spark frustration; Motsoaledi outlined how the commission had ordered the reinstatement and back pay of a junior employee who had released illegal immigrants about to be deported.

Banks also came in for a ministerial drubbing. They may say they want to fight corruption, but they make it difficult to get information by citing client confidentiality, said the minister.

No MPs asked whether such difficulties were not perhaps a case of Home Affairs not getting its ducks in order – it was a very conciliatory committee meeting.

Not a word was said about the Constitutional Court judgment that the electoral law must allow independent candidates to contest provincial and national elections. MPs of the home affairs committee were meant to have been briefed in late August about the ministerial task team looking into such changes and new legislation, but that meeting was postponed.

It looks increasingly implausible for Parliament to meet the Constitutional Court’s June 2022 deadline for the new electoral law. The average time Parliament takes to adopt a law is two years.  

On Friday the parliamentary home affairs committee will be briefed by the Electoral Commission of South Africa on its readiness for the 2021 local government elections

www.samigration.com