Will my second wife be able to change her surname to mine?

The short answer

You'll need to register your customary marriage

The whole question

My wife and I married in community of property in 2019. We agreed to be in a polygamous marriage, and that I could take a second wife. I already paid lobola for my second wife. What processes do we need to follow in order for her to change her surname to mine once we’re married?

The long answer

All polygamous marriages must be in agreement with the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998 (RCMA). What that means practically is that you as the husband in an already existing customary marriage must draft a new marriage contract which must be approved by a court before you can marry another wife.

Customary marriage expert, Nthabiseng Monareng, explains that this is because customary marriages are automatically in community of property, and before a husband marries a second wife, the first wife must be given half her share of the marriage assets. This is to make sure that the first wife’s rights are protected and she is not cheated out of what is legally hers.

The court considers the rights of all the parties and may add conditions to make the second marriage valid under the RCMA.

John Manyike, the head of financial education at Old Mutual adds, “It's important to celebrate the customary marriage after lobola negotiations have been concluded. By merely paying or receiving lobola in full without the requisite celebration, the marriage is not concluded in accordance with customary law and is therefore considered invalid. That's why it's important to know the relationship between lobola and a legal marriage.”

According to customary law expert Zama Mopai, “For a customary marriage to be valid, you must first enter into the marriage according to custom, and once that is done then you can proceed to register it.”

A customary marriage should be registered within three months at the Department of Home Affairs. The registering officer at Home Affairs then issues a registration certificate. This is proof that the marriage exists and may avoid disputes in future, although if you don’t register the marriage, the marriage is still valid under the RCMA. However the Deeds Office insists on registration certificates to prove the validity of a customary marriage, so it’s advisable to register the marriage.

Registering the marriage also answers your question about how your second wife can take your surname: Home Affairs has stated that a woman has three options regarding which surname she takes when she gets married:

  • She can take her husband’s surname
  • She can add her surname to her husband’s (a double-barrel surname)
  • She can keep her own surname.

As women married under the RCMA have the same status as women married under the Marriage Act or the Civil Union Act (which do not allow for polygamy), your second wife has the right to take your surname if she chooses and to have that surname recorded on the registration certificate.

 


Will I go to prison and be deported for jumping the border?

The short answer

You can be sentenced to up to 12 months in prison for entering the country illegally.

The whole question

The girlfriend of a buddy of mine from Zimbabwe was arrested in January in Limpopo. She has been in custody since.

We have learnt from a police officer that she was found guilty of being a border jumper and sentenced to six months.

Is this normal?

 The long answer

Thank you for your email asking whether it is normal for a person to be sentenced to six months prison after being found guilty of border jumping.

Unfortunately, it is normal.

Under the Immigration Act, a person who is found to be illegally in South Africa - an undocumented immigrant - can be detained for up to 30 days at the Lindela Detention Centre, and this detention can be extended up to 90 days by a court. A person can be fined, or prosecuted. If the court found your friend’s girlfriend guilty, she could be sentenced to up to 12 months in prison. She could also be deported before the sentence is up.

Your friend could contact the following organisations for advice


What rights to accessing education, healthcare and other vital services do migrants have?

‘There are various pathways and provisions in the law that recognise that people should not be stateless, and we are failing to ensure that these people have papers,’ says Global Movement Against Statelessness’ Christy Chitengu.
Christy Chitengu was born in South Africa and regards herself as a South African, despite her parents being Zimbabwean.
She had called South Africa home for her entire life, but for many years, Chitengu could not freely access services that many citizens and residents take for granted.
“I was undocumented for most of my life, so I have a lived experience of what it’s like to live in South Africa without papers. The exclusion from [accessing services] is vast and it touches the most vital rights,” said Chitengu.
She said she only realised the challenge of not having documentation when she was in Grade 11 and, with 10 undocumented pupils, was called into the principal’s office at her high school.
“Sitting in the office, I was questioned by the principal, who asked why I was in school and how I got into school. ‘You cannot write your matric exams if you do not have documentation,’ [said the principal.]”
National legislation states that non-South African children, including undocumented persons, asylum-seekers and refugees, may not be denied access to a basic education. This legal framework has been upheld by the courts.
Chitengu and her mother went to Home Affairs, where she was told that her South African birth certificate did not mean she could go to school here.
“A lot of people don’t realise that these handwritten birth certificates that they hold on to are insufficient, and that only comes to light when they try to access services like education,” she said.
Chitengu’s experience effectively effectively highlighted the bureaucratic hurdles that restrict access to education for many undocumented minors.
As a 16-year-old, Chitengu contacted Lawyers for Human Rights, which helped her get a court order that reaffirmed her right to education and allowed her to write her final exams.
After years of being undocumented, Chitengu obtained her South African citizenship last year, following the judgment in Ali v Minister of Home Affairs which, in summary, declared that persons over the age of 18 born of non-South African parents in South Africa were citizens, on condition that their births were registered and they could prove their presence in SA from birth to date.
Chitengu is now the co-lead of the Global Movement Against Statelessness.
Health for all
Section 27(1) of the Constitution says everyone living in South Africa has the right to access healthcare services. However, this was not what an asylum seeker experienced after suffering an injury that needed urgent medical attention.
Speaking to Daily Maverick on condition of anonymity, the asylum seeker told how he struggled to access healthcare services because he was undocumented due to inefficiencies and alleged corruption at the Home Affairs refugee reception centre.
He initially had valid documentation as an asylum seeker. It expired in 2020 and he could not renew it because of the Covid-19 lockdown. After the lockdown, his attempts to renew his papers met with challenges from Department of Home Affairs officials, including requests for bribes to speed up the process. Without documentation, he had difficulty getting a job, opening a bank account and accessing vital services.
“I realised I was in trouble when I got into an accident and injured my knee. I needed an operation, but when I went to Helen Joseph Hospital, they refused to help me unless I paid upfront and showed them my papers. I tried so many times but the staff were so rude. [They] turned me away and offered me no help,” he said.
In 2023, the public interest law group SECTION27 and three people took the Gauteng Department of Health, the National Department of Health and Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital to court for excluding asylum seekers, undocumented migrants and people dealing with statelessness from accessing free healthcare.
Chitengu said many migrant mothers were turned away from hospitals because of a government circular that authorised the denial of access to healthcare.
This is despite national legislation stipulating that all pregnant and lactating women, and children under six, irrespective of nationality and documentation status, have the right to access free health services at all public establishments.
It took a court case “to remind people that everyone has the right to basic healthcare services, but above and beyond [that], pregnant and lactating mothers also are entitled to maternal healthcare. The fact that … a pregnant mother should be turned away is a grave denial of someone’s right to healthcare,” said Chitengu.
Realising administrative justice
South Africa’s porous borders and lack of border authority have made it easier for people to enter the country illegally, increasing the number of undocumented migrants. However, inefficiency and corruption at the Department of Home Affairs have also created a situation where foreign nationals who want to live in South Africa legally cannot do so because they cannot access documentation.
“If we had a well-run Home Affairs department that attends to birth registrations and naturalisation in a timely fashion, if the Refugee Reception Office was processing people’s asylum and refugee claims in a timely manner, we would not have this amount of undocumented people in this country,” said Chitengu.
In July, in his first official act as Home Affairs minister, Leon Schreiber extended the temporary concession for foreign nationals who were awaiting the outcome of visa, waiver and appeal applications.
The extension effectively safeguards applicants from adverse consequences while they await the outcome of their applications. The concession applies to migrants who have been legally admitted into South Africa.
Schreiber also announced that the department would re-establish the dormant Immigration Advisory Board to address illegal migration in South Africa. The board will advise the government on immigration policies to ensure that they align with national interests and address the complexities of migration.
Chitengu said, “There are various pathways and provisions in the law that recognise that people should not be stateless, and we are failing to ensure that these people have papers.
“The approach should be to make sure that people are documented. Making sure people are documented does not mean giving everybody citizenship; it means giving people a piece of paper with their name and nationality that they can use to live a full life in South Africa. It all comes down to administrative justice


Schreiber promises no more long queues, off-line systems at Home Affairs as digital move beckons

Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber said that plans were underway for the Department of Home Affairs to switch from working manually to digitally.
CAPE TOWN - Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber said that long queues, off-line systems, and paper-based applications at department offices would soon be a thing of the past.
Schreiber said that plans were underway for the Department of Home Affairs to switch from working manually to digitally.
The minister said that embracing technological solutions was key to turning the department's fortunes around.
Minister Schreiber said that Home Affairs would soon introduce a paperless system similar to the online portal used by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and the banks.
Schreiber said that the department would create a secure platform through the use of facial and fingerprint recognition tools.
"No more standing in queues, no more waiting months or years for an outcome of an application, no more being kept in the dark about the status of an application, and no more space for officials or syndicates to solicit bribes for a transaction to be processed."
Schreiber said he would not rest until belief was restored in South Africans that the department could work and thrive.


Lesotho counts foreign-owned businesses, says SA retailers must find local partners


Lesotho has restarted a plan to act against foreign-owned businesses, and to pressure South African companies to work via Basotho-owned distributors. 

The kingdom created new regulations in 2021 that could see foreign-owned businesses kicked out, but has been moving slowly on implementation for fear of paralysing the smallest economy in the region.

A list of 47 business types, from general dealers to barbers, are reserved for locals under those rules.

On Friday, Trade and Industry Minister Mokhethi Shelile told the National Assembly that an inspection in Maseru in June found that the overwhelming majority of businesses in areas reserved for locals were in the hands of foreigners.

"A total of 106 businesses were inspected and 80 belonged to foreigners. The foreign-owned businesses account for 90% of the jobs in this sector," he said.

In Maseru, Chinese and Indian owners dominated.

Their businesses were also far more likely to employ foreigners; foreign-owned businesses employed 119 expatriates, while Basotho-owned businesses employed only four foreigners between them, Shelile said.

The government said it was seeing people from countries other than China and India move into sectors such as retail, and that it was seeing an increase in newly naturalised owners.

"There are 13 businesses whose owners were naturalised," Shelile said, adding that there was a likelihood the figure would increase because others claimed they were naturalised and said they would bring their documentation.

Shelile said the government had urged South African firms, mostly in the retail sector, to enlist local distributors.

The government wants to see about 800 SA businesses do such deals, covering 80% of imported goods.

The government also wants to end the practice of locals being employed by third-party agents in South Africa, who then provide their services to South African companies required to employ Basotho people.

That system means taxes go to South Africa rather than Lesotho, Shelile explained.

"Sales commissions that are paid to these sales representatives and foreign agents attract tax in South Africa, not Lesotho. Youth unemployment is very high and government debt is very high," he said.

A similar inspection was done in Leribe in mid-August, and another is due in Mafeteng this month.