KwaMhlanga Magistrate’s Court charged Alfred Ubissi, 31, with fraud and corruption for allegedly obtaining an ID illegally with the help of a home affairs official.
• Alfred Ubissi, 31, was charged with fraud and corruption for allegedly obtaining an ID illegally with the help of a home affairs official, Violet Mabena.
• Mabena reportedly charged R20 000 for the forged document.
• She allegedly took Ubissi’s fingerprints, crafting an ID with someone else’s details but Ubissi’s photo.

A 31-year-old accused of identity theft, with the alleged assistance of a Department of Home Affairs official, was charged with fraud and corruption in the KwaMhlanga Magistrate’s Court on Friday.

The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (Hawks) said they arrested Alfred Ubissi, believed to have been born in South Africa to a Zimbabwean father and a Mozambican mother, on Thursday on charges of fraud and corruption.
According to the Hawks, Ubissi allegedly approached Violet Mabena, a home affairs official, in 2021 to arrange an ID, as he was born to parents from two different neighbouring countries.

“The two parties entered into an agreement, and the home affairs employee put a price tag of R20 000 to finalise the deal,” the Hawks said in a statement.
The Hawks said that according to their information, Mabena arrived at Ubissi’s home on the agreed day with a fingerprints form and inkpad, where she proceeded to take his fingerprints.

“[She] completed the names reflecting on the birth certificate belonging to an unknown person to the suspect. It is alleged that after fingerprints were taken, Mabena was paid R3 000,” said the Hawks.

“Four months later, in December 2021, Mabena came to the suspect’s place with the identity document bearing the suspect’s photo, but somebody else’s name and surname.”

The Hawks received information from a reliable source, prompting an investigation that led to the court issuing a warrant of arrest against Mabena.
Mabena was arrested at her workplace in November last year.

She appeared in the KwaMhlanga Magistrate’s Court on the same day and was released on R3 000 bail.
“An intense investigation led the court to issue a warrant of arrest against the suspect [Ubissi],” said the Hawks.
The head of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation in Mpumalanga, Major-General Nico Gerber, expressed satisfaction with the professional investigation and stated that he believes justice will be served.
“We will not tolerate corruption in whatever form and will persevere in ensuring justice is served,” he said.

South African Citizen by Descent
South African Citizen by Naturalisation:
Automatic loss of Citizenship
Resumption of South African citizenship
Deprivation of Citizenship
South African Citizen by Naturalisation:
Automatic loss of Citizenship
Resumption of South African citizenship
Acquisition of the citizenship or nationality of another country

How can we help you?
Please email us to info@samigration.com
Whatsapp message us on: +27 82 373 8415

Where are you now?
Check our website : www.samigration.com

Please rate us by clinking on this links :
Sa Migration Visas
https://g.page/SAMigration?gm


Get More Info By Following Our Page: https://www.youtube.com/@samigration

The Department of Home Affairs has been forced to reconsider its approach to amending the Refugees Act after legal advisers rejected its proposed changes to controversial sections that had been ruled unconstitutional.

The Department of Home Affairs (DHA) must go back to the drawing board to align the Refugees Act with the Constitution, following advice against its proposed approach to sections 22(12) and 22(13) of the legislation.
This emerged during a meeting in Parliament of the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs on Tuesday, at which Home Affairs Minister Dr Leon Schreiber and other DHA officials updated the committee on progress in amending sections of the legislation that courts had ruled were constitutionally deficient.
In 2023, the Scalabrini Centre took the DHA to court over amendments made to the Refugees Act in 2020, specifically the introduction of sections 22(12) and 22(13).

These sections provided for the “automatic abandonment” of asylum applications if an asylum seeker or refugee failed to renew their permit within one month of its expiry. In practice, this meant that if an asylum seeker did not renew their visa, the DHA could presume they no longer wished to seek refugee status or apply for asylum, and could be subject to deportation or required to leave South Africa.
Scalabrini brought the case before the Western Cape High Court, arguing that the provisions infringed constitutional rights, including the rights to life, dignity, and freedom and security of the person. The organisation cited the practical and systemic challenges that applicants face at the DHA when attempting to renew their permits.

Earlier this month, the court declared the provisions invalid and unconstitutional.
Following the judgment, the DHA consulted the Refugee Appeals Authority and the Standing Committee for Refugee Affairs. Both bodies supported the subsections declared constitutionally invalid, recommending their retention but proposing that the period for renewing an expired visa be extended from one month to 180 days, in line with the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act.
However, the Office of the Chief State Law Adviser (OCSLA), which provides legal counsel to the executive and all government departments, declined to issue a preliminary certificate for the draft Bill.

It said the DHA’s approach to the judgment and its attempt to amend the legislation failed to address the fundamental reasons that sections 22(12) and 22(13) were declared invalid, which were:
• The provisions were arbitrary, as their introduction meant asylum seekers could be deported not solely on the merits of their claims but due to external circumstances.
• The provisions did not account for external factors that might prevent the renewal of asylum visas, such as the location of the nearest Refugee Reception Office (RRO), the length of queues at RROs, or the workload within these offices.
The DHA has concluded that any amendments to the Act will need to be addressed through a supplementary white paper at a later stage.

DHA pivots on legal challenge approach
The DHA’s next attempt at amending the Act is likely to comply with constitutional requirements, if Schreiber’s address to the portfolio committee is any indication.

Schreiber noted that Home Affairs was among the most litigated departments in government, if not the most, and that this was something the DHA aimed to change.
He stated that the department no longer viewed litigation as something that must always be opposed at any cost, adding: “We are looking at cases in a much more merit-based way, considering whether there are prospects of success and certainly not making decisions to oppose matters for the sake of it.”
Discussing the department’s approach to legal challenges, Schreiber said the DHA’s decisions were always anchored in legal advice, constitutionality and the requirements of the law.

“We have a high mountain to climb in terms of re-establishing the rule of law in this space of Home Affairs — whether it is civics, immigration or the asylum management system — and we cannot do that unless we ourselves are leading by example,” said Schreiber.
He emphasised that ensuring the DHA’s operations and functions aligned with the Constitution was not merely about improving the department’s image, but also about reducing costs.

“The contingent liability that comes from legal exposure, as well as the day-to-day cost of spending so much money on legal cases, is in and of itself, in the current budget environment, a very clear reason for us to focus on this area and make sure we reduce the burden of legal cases on this department,” he said.

Newsletters are always the best way to keep our clients informed of the rapid changes in the immigration world and we can update you in this regard by you subscribing to our free newsletter.

SAMI issues a monthly Newsletter to update you on topical immigration and related matters that we believe you should be aware of especially with regard to the procedures and rules pertaining thereto. These newsletters will provide you with useful information on any aspect of life related to immigration and relocation. If you are interested in a visa or just to visit you should subscribe to the Free Newsletter service of SAMI.
Enhance your knowledge

How can we help you?
Please email us to info@samigration.com
Whatsapp message us on: +27 82 373 8415

Where are you now?
Check our website : www.samigration.com

Please rate us by clinking on this links :
Sa Migration Visas
https://g.page/SAMigration?gm


Get More Info By Following Our Page: https://www.youtube.com/@samigration

SA Migration specializes in assisting people from all over the world to relocate to this wonderful country. We are proud to be a leader in the field of migration and relocation. SA Migration was founded out of the need for a specialist organization to assist migrants to South Africa. SA Migration head office is located in Cape Town, South Africa, adjacent to the Department of Home Affairs.

How can we help you?
Please email us to info@samigration.com
Whatsapp message us on: +27 82 373 8415

Where are you now?
Check our website : www.samigration.com

Please rate us by clinking on this links :
Sa Migration Visas
https://g.page/SAMigration?gm


Get More Info By Following Our Page: https://www.youtube.com/@samigration