Why immigration numbers don’t add up

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil is announcing big changes to the visa system, but that won’t do much to deter surging net immigration numbers.
Anthony Albanese says his government inherited a migration system that was “not fit for purpose”. That’s true. Just how Labor expects to fix the biggest issues in migration is still not clear after the release of its response to visa fraud and exploitation on Wednesday.
According to Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil, she is getting on with the job of cleaning up the mess left by one particular ministerial predecessor Peter Dutton  who she claims presided over a failing migration system that facilitated “some of the worst crimes in our society”.
The government’s commitment is to crack down much harder on visa rorts and fraudulent agents while offering up some dramatic expulsions of criminal sex and drug traffickers.
Naturally, Dutton denounces all this as a distraction on the eve of the Voice referendum, arguing he cancelled 6000 visas of criminals far more than O’Neil has managed. He won’t be taking lectures from Labor, he insists, given its previous record of “losing control of the borders”.
The Opposition leader also blames O’Neil for “presiding” over 105,000 asylum seekers without acknowledging most arrived in the Coalition era. Labor is about to announce reforms in this area too.
But beyond trading political barbs over criminality or abuse or asylum seekers, the larger policy dilemma for the government is surging legal net overseas immigration numbers.
These are running at well over 450,000 to the year to March relative to the official annual delivery of 190,000 permanent visas for migrants.
Immigration numbers are always a sensitive issue domestically, especially in Sydney and Melbourne which attract the majority of new migrants.
How this official 190,000 permanent annual intake will work with the much higher number of temporary visa holders remains to be explained.
Successive Australian governments have always expressed pride in a highly successful multicultural society given nearly 30 per cent of people were born overseas  far more than the comparable figures in the US (14 per cent), the UK (17 per cent) or Canada (23 per cent). Another 20 per cent plus of people in Australia have at least one parent born overseas in a country that has relied heavily on waves of immigration over generations.
Given the low unemployment rate and the extreme labour shortages, business certainly wants to encourage more immigration now, whether temporary or permanent. The union movement is traditionally reluctant to endorse this rather than providing more training and jobs for Australians. But when housing supply is so scarce and rents so expensive, the politics of today’s record numbers become ever more difficult generally.
Federal governments are careful never to express detailed opinions on what the long-term targets for net overseas migration should be, wary of reviving the “big Australia” debate and, more recently, of risking Australia’s lucrative export revenue from international students.
The intergenerational reports under both the Coalition and Labor simply nominated the figure of 235,000 as a Treasury “assumption”.
O’Neil maintains that one of the real drivers of today’s high figure for net overseas migration is lower departure numbers.
“People are coming and they are staying for longer and in some instances they are not leaving,” she said. “We can’t run a sustainable migration system in that way.”
Yet, the obvious benefits in making it easier and quicker to expel criminals and dodgy long-term visa holders or blocking highly dubious international student applications will do relatively little to reduce overall numbers in Australia.
As of July this year, there are just over 2.5 million people here on temporary visas. This figure, though, includes around 700,000 New Zealanders who will now find it easier to get Australian citizenship after Labor agreed to this pathway for those who have lived here for more than four years.
As well as around 650,000 international students, 200,000 graduates, 330,000 visitors and 130,000 working holidaymakers, there are 130,000 temporary skilled workers and 190,000 temporary visa holders who are also employed.
Labor’s immigration policy reforms to be announced this month will focus on encouraging the particular skills the workforce badly needs while also allowing more temporary visa holders to become permanent residents.
Measures will include simplifying the plethora of categories and visas, reforming the current complicated “points” system and fast-tracking approvals for both highly paid professionals and for lower paid workers in aged care. Temporary visa holders won’t have to remain with their sponsor employer.
Yet how this official 190,000 permanent annual intake will work with the much higher number of temporary visa holders remains to be explained.
Some of those on temporary visas and already here, including international students, will be granted permanent status from that annual quota, for example. But many more temporary visa holders have been staying despite having no real prospects of being granted permanent residency while new temporary visa holders continue to flood in. There are 200,000 more international students who have arrived since the beginning of the year.
The government’s tougher compliance and education standards for student visas  as well as a reduction in work hours permitted  may reduce that imbalance over time. But it’s hard to imagine Labor can engage in mass deportation, especially when many of those here can legally extend their stay by enrolling in more courses.
Such training should logically fit with Australia’s desperate need for more skills and trained workers  assuming, of course, that the courses are appropriately tailored and adequate to address the real shortages.
So far, meeting that goal, too, has proven elusive.
Jobs and Skills Australia’s report released on Wednesday notes Australia faces a skills challenge not seen since the 1960s. It predicts that as well as building the necessary training and skills in the vocational and higher education sectors, the government’s migration reforms will allow skilled migration to effectively address labour shortages and boost productivity.
That’s the harder test to come.

Anger mounts over UIF chaos as business, labour call for crackdown

Thulas Nxesi, Minister of Labour and Employment, wants action against his director general for UIF investment dalliances. 

• Dysfunction and corruption are crippling the UIF, say Cosatu and BUSA.

• The heads of the UIF and the Department of Labour are now on the chopping block.

• A full audit of unlisted investments has been called for.

Both business and organised labour on Wednesday called for the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) to be placed under administration and its investments investigated independently as the fund sinks deeper into dysfunction, and suspicion of corruption grows. 

The UIF is an employer- and employee-funded social security fund collected through a payroll tax on all formal sector workers. While the government does not contribute to the fund, it is administered by the Department of Labour and Employment, with business and labour playing an advisory role. 

But workers, who can draw on the funds when they become unemployed or take maternity leave, are made to wait months for benefits, if these are paid at all, due to UIF systems failure. 

The UIF sits on investments of about R130 billion, managed by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC). In its annual report this week, the PIC noted that the UIF investments had slightly underperformed against the investment benchmark. 

Cosatu, which added its voice to a statement released by Business Unity SA (BUSA) earlier in the day, now wants all UIF employees subjected to lifestyle audits. BUSA had called for the UIF to be put under immediate administration due to `systemic dysfunction`, corruption, and ineptitude.

Several of its UIF`s investments in unlisted entities have gone bad and been tainted by corruption. These include its investments in Daybreak Farms, managed by a former UIF employee, in which it invested R800 million; and Bounty Brands, which lost more than R5 billion. 

The latest scheme under scrutiny is a R5 billion `job creation scheme` in which the fund provided a grant to Thuja Capital Fund to acquire stakes in companies, which would then be pressurised to take on more employees. Thuja Capital Fund is owned by Mthunzi Mdwaba, who at the time was the chair of Productivity SA, another state entity under the Department of Labour and Employment. 

`Get-rich-quick scheme`

Minister of Employment and Labour, Thulas Nxesi, who has asked UIF commissioner Teboho Maruping and Director-General of Employment and Labour Thobile Lamati why they should not be suspended over the transaction, is believed to be in favour of their dismissal. Nxesi has handed a report to President Cyril Ramaphosa, who appoints and removes directors-general, and is awaiting his decision. 

Cosatu has described the project as a `get-rich-quick scheme` and called for decisive action against all involved. 

Apart from the corruption allegations, business and labour are angry at the serious dysfunction of the UIF and the lack of action taken to fix it. BUSA`s Nedlac labour market convenor Jonny Goldberg said three letters to Nxesi and Lamati since last November had not received a reply. 

Thousands of workers are still owed Covid-19 TERS payments and payments under the Workers Affected by Unrest (WABU) scheme put in place after the July riots. 

Cosatu said: 

Workers struggle to submit their claims and receive their payments. There are perennial queues at UIF offices across the country where workers wait in vain for days on end to have their claims processed… the issues range from an IT system that is routinely offline, to understaffed offices, overstretched employees, user-unfriendly and confusing forms and applications systems, as well as delinquent employers who pickpocket workers` contributions and fail to hand them over to the UIF.

Goldberg said that due to the constant failure of the UIF systems, when the Covid-19 pandemic began, business had stepped in to develop a parallel IT system free of charge. But the Department of Labour had rejected the offer in favour of keeping their own, and it had never been used. 

The UIF has failed to produce audited financial statements for the past two years. In a letter from Nxesi to the Speaker of Parliament published on Wednesday, the minister requested an extension to provisions under the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), which calls for annual financial statements to be tabled by the end of September. 

Nxesi said that the 2021/22 financial statements would be submitted at the end of October, while those for 2022/23 would only be ready by the end of June 2024, as the audit had not yet begun. 

The minister listed two primary reasons for the UIF`s failure. First, he said that the UIF and the companies in which it invested and had differing financial years, which made the audit difficult. 

Second, he said that the Generally Recognised Accounting Practice (GRAP) standards required by the PFMA would have `inevitably resulted in numerous audit findings and a poor audit outcome`.

This was particularly the case in auditing the unlisted entities in which the UIF has invested. His department has prepared a technical document for submission to the Treasury, proposing changes to GRAP in auditing its investments.

Let our people be employed in our country`: ANC leaders tout foreign hiring restrictions

Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi is leading the ANC`s push to restrict the employment of foreign nationals in the province. 

• The Gauteng premier is leading the ANC`s push to restrict the employment of foreign nationals in the province as the youth unemployment crisis seems to have defeated the ANC. 

• Panyaza Lesufi and ANC provincial secretary TK Nciza said the time had come for local citizens to be given priority in employment by private businesses. 

• Immigration experts have warned against this political rhetoric, saying it was dangerous and was only used as an excuse to mask the failures of the ANC governance.

Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi wants to restrict the number of foreign nationals employed by businesses in Gauteng to put a dent in worrying unemployment figures. 

Lesufi and Gauteng ANC provincial secretary TK Nciza proposed the plan to restrict how many foreign nationals can be employed, saying it was time for local citizens to be given priority in the country`s economic hub. 

“We are saying there must be a quota on employing locals. Everybody sits and looks to the government for employment. We are calling on the private sector to start employing locals, and we must agree on a quota. We must have a quota, and we will start in Gauteng. It is time. 

`You go to a restaurant, and you hardly come across a South African. I was impressed [by] one restaurant in Durban [where] everyone was South African. We have [a] serious issue of unemployment, and the youth are not working. We are not saying people must be xenophobic, we are saying let`s have a quota and let our people be employed in their own country,` Nciza said on Thursday at the ANC Gauteng press briefing. 

Immigration experts have warned that this political rhetoric so close to elections threatens foreign nationals. 

They said the ANC was relying on right-wing populist messaging to lure support ahead of elections in a context where the party`s track record in governance had failed to produce a strong economy that could enable employment. 

But the ANC provincial leaders dug in, saying South African businesses should employ South Africans. 

`We have a private sector that is not coming to the party. We are calling upon them to start employing South Africans and let`s agree on a quota, and we will engage ...,` Nciza said. 

The rhetoric to target foreign nationals comes months ahead of crucial elections for the ANC, where the party faces losing control of Gauteng. 

It narrowly held onto the province in 2019, and election experts have warned it may not be able to win a majority in 2024. 

University of Johannesburg`s Professor Trevor Ngwane said policies that aimed to restrict the employment of foreigners would likely affect desperate citizens from South Africa`s neighbouring countries of Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Lesotho. 

`The divide-and-rule tactics target our SADC neighbours and goes against President Cyril Ramaphosa`s efforts to create and encourage a free-zone movement around the SADC region.  

`This is the same right-wing, xenophobic sentiment that we have seen around the world in populist speeches. The ANC has failed to create jobs as a ruling party, and now it is trying to find scapegoats, playing to the audience, and fanning sentiments of division and hate against our neighbours,` Ngwane said. 

Sharon Ekambaram, head of the refugee and migrants rights programme at Lawyers for Human Rights, shared similar sentiments, saying that targeting foreigners was an effort to scapegoat the failures of governance. 

`The evidence does not support this rhetoric. It is clear that this is scapegoating by the government after failing to ensure basic service delivery to the people.  

`There is no data about the number of migrants that live in Gauteng, let alone in South Africa. We have no capacity to collect this data, provinces are even struggling to budget for basic services because they have no knowledge of how many live in various provinces,` Ekambaram said. 

`They do not have this data, and instead, they blame foreign nationals for every failure even in the provision of health care.”

Ekambaram said Lawyers for Human Rights had successfully pointed out the unconstitutionality of a Township Development Bill presented to the Gauteng legislature by the ANC. 

The legislation would have barred foreign nationals from establishing businesses in the province`s townships. The Gauteng government has since amended that section of the bill. 

The concerns about foreign nationals in Gauteng have lingered mainly on the issue of illegal mining. 

When launching the ANC`s manifesto review, Ramaphosa said the government had launched an initiative to identify illegal immigrants.

`We continue to have foreign nationals who do not have documents. A programme has been started to examine who among foreign nationals does not have documents, and a number of them are being arrested.

Ramaphosa said:

Those who do not have permits to be in South Africa better know now that South Africans want this country to be occupied by people who have documents or who are citizens of our country.

The rise in the unemployment rate among young people has added to the woes faced by Lesufi and the ANC as the party aims to remain in charge of the province.

Lesufi conducted a massive employment drive in the province to show that the government was doing something about youth unemployment. 

He promised to advertise thousands of jobs this year until the end of the ANC term in government. 

When he launched his job recruitment programme for 8 000 jobs, 1.2 million young people applied. 

He said, in July, that the figures showed how grave the unemployment crisis was.

Pakistani and SA nationals slapped with lengthy jail terms for passport crimes

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has welcomed the lengthy jail terms meted out to two South Africans and a Pakistani national in separate cases in Durban and Johannesburg, respectively, for passport related crimes. Arfan Ahmed, a Pakistani was arrested in a sting operation involving the Counter Corruption Branch of Home Affairs, the Hawks and the Police Crime Intelligence on 24 March at the Home Affairs office in Krugersdorp.


Pakistani national

Motsoaledi’s spokesperson Siya Qoza said Ahmed was sentenced to eight years by the Brixton Magistrate’s Court for the passports found in his house after his arrest in Krugersdorp.


“The Department awaits his sentencing for his role in the Krugersdorp passport syndicate. Ahmed is a kingpin of a passport syndicate that sought to undermine the country’s laws by fraudulently procuring South African passports for Pakistani nationals, who did not have a legal right to possess South African passports.


“He was working with some corrupt officials of Home Affairs in a network that spanned Gauteng, Limpopo, KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape, Western Cape and Mpumalanga. While the Pakistani is languishing in jail, the 12 corrupt Home Affairs officials who enabled his scheme have already been fired and submitted to the Hawks for criminal investigations,” Qoza said.


Home affairs official

In a separate case, the Durban Magistrate’s Court sentenced Anda Ngozi and Nomthandazo Mboyane to 26 and 24 years respectively for fraud, as well as for contravention of the Identification and immigration Act and Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.


“The sentences of the two will run concurrently, practically meaning that Ngozi will spend 10 years while Mboyane will spend eight years [in prison],” Qoza said.


Qoza said the duo were officials of the Department of Home Affairs employed at the office in Queenstown, in the Eastern Cape.


“They used to travel 650 km each way at a time during the night to Home Affairs offices in Commercial Road and in Prospecton in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, to fraudulently process 52 passports to foreign nationals, mostly from the DRC, who are not legally entitled to them.


“They were paid between R3 000 and R5 000 for each passport. South Africans who were prepared to lend their identities for this nefarious scheme were paid a paltry R500. These were usually young people who were on nyaope,” Qoza said.


The two were arrested in November 2022 after a probe led by the Counter Corruption Branch.

The Durban Magistrate’s Court also ordered that the 52 passports be surrendered to the State


Justice

Motsoaledi said he was extremely pleased the courts were meting out lengthy sentences to those who seek to undermine the integrity of Home Affairs systems.

“I am also happy the collective work of the multidisciplinary law enforcement teams has ensured that these rascals face the full might of the law for their criminal actions.”

Motsoaledi added he was looking forward to the sentencing of more people related to these two cases as the Hawks continued with their investigations.

“Once again, I want to reiterate that we shall stop at nothing in ensuring that all Home Affairs officials who engage in malfeasance face the full might of the law. If you are at Home Affairs and are corrupt, expect our knock at your door.”

Motsoaledi said the actions of corrupt officials, kingpins, South Africans and corrupt foreign nationals have severe consequences for the country.

“Because of this abuse of the passport application system, Home Affairs has drastically changed the processes through which passports are acquired in the country,” Motsoaledi said.

Home Affairs Verification Processes, Getting Smarter

In a recent meeting attended by SAQA affiliates , Immigration Practitioners & Lawyers , DHA presented a webinar hosted by Phindiwe Mbhele - Director: Corporate Accounts  he highlighted the great level of fraud perpetuated by people from fake SAQA certificates , fake qualifications , fake bank statements fake employment contracts and employment letters . In addition there are a number of fake spousal and life partner relationships , please be aware Home Affairs have increased their detection of fake documents and below is an example of a letter that Home Affairs will send prospective applicants if fraud is suspected .


Example of Fraud Detected During Verification 

Comments : 1 

• In terms of Section 49 (14 ) of the Immigration Act ,any purpose who for the purpose or entering in or remaining in , or departing from , or of facilitating m or facilitating the entrance into , residence in or departure from , the republic , whether in contravention of the Act or not , commits any fraudulent act , or makes any false representation by conduct , statement or otherwise , shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment no exceeding eight ( 8 ) years 

• Through telephonic communication with ABC  college , human resource it was confirmed that the applicant is an educator , and not what is specified in the employment contract 

• An email was then sent whereby it was confirmed that the submitted employment contract is not correct and is not in any way a true reflection of the letter of employment they have in their records 

• They confirmed that the employment contract I sent for verification was altered in all respects  and the MD’s signature is fraudulent 

• Applicant is therefore of no sound and good character to sojourn in the republic 


How can we help you , please email us to info@samigration.com whatsapp message me on: 

 +27 82 373 8415, where are you now? check our website : www.samigration.com


Please rate us by clinking on this links : 

Sa Migration Visas

https://g.page/SAMigration?gm


Alternatively , please contact us on :



 Whatsapp  Tel No : +27 (0) 82 373 8415  ( Whatsapp messages only, No calls )


Tel No office : +27 (0) 82 373 8415 ( Whatsapp messages only, No calls ) 

Tel No landline CT  :  +27 (0) 21 879 5560

Tel No landline JHB : +27 (0) 12 880 1490 

Tel No admin : +27 (0) 64 126 3073  ( Whatsapp calls only  No Messages ) 

Tel No sales : +27 (0) 74 0366127  ( Whatsapp calls only  No Messages )


www.samigration.com