Zimbabweans head to court
over government’s decision not to renew immigration permits
Money Web - 13 Dec
2021
Hundreds of thousands could
find themselves out of work, without bank accounts, or unable to return to SA
after the December break.
The Beitbridge border
between South Africa and Zimbabwe near Musina. Image: Guillem
Sartorio/AFP/Getty Images
The Zimbabwe Exemption
Permit (ZEP) Holders Association and non-profit organisation African Amity have
brought an urgent application before the High Court in Johannesburg to overturn
the decision by the director-general of Home Affairs not to renew permits
granted to more than 250 000 Zimbabweans in SA.
The permits expire at the
end of December 2021, after which the Department of Home Affairs has instructed
them to apply for “mainstream visas” and to ensure that their applications
comply with the provisions and requirements of the Immigration Act and its
accompanying regulations.
The Home Affairs directive
goes on to advise companies, employers, learning institutions and banks to
discontinue services to those in possession of a ZEP expiring on December 31,
unless they submit proof of their application for a mainstream visa.
‘Impossible’ task
Emma Dimairho, deposing for
African Amity, says this requirement is impossible to meet, “unreasonable,
unfair, cruel and leaves thousands of ZEP holders in jeopardy of losing their
jobs” as well as financial services. The decision by Home Affairs will cause
irreparable harm unless the court intervenes on an urgent basis, says the court
application.
The case will be heard on
an urgent basis on Tuesday, December 14. Also cited as respondents, who are
opposing the matter, are President Cyril Ramaphosa, the minister of Home
Affairs and the cabinet.
ZEPs and its predecessors
have been in existence since 2009 and were an attempt to regularise the
residence status of those Zimbabweans residing illegally in SA due to political
and economic instability at home.
The ZEP Holders Association
launched a separate case in October to have the Gauteng High Court declare them
permanent residents, as their existing permits are due to expire at the end of
this year.
Neither the minister nor
the director-general of Home Affairs filed opposing affidavits in this matter,
though they did file a notice of intention to oppose on November 8.
Two weeks later, on
November 24, Home Affairs decided not to renew the ZEP permit.
Police clearance hurdle
Dimairho explains that it
is impossible for permit holders to comply with the government’s latest
directive and remain legal in SA, as they would have to obtain police
clearances from both SA and Zimbabwe. In Zimbabwe, this process typically takes
six weeks.
“The Zimbabwean police
clearance can only be obtained in Zimbabwe, and requires fingerprints obtained
there.
“No ZEP holder, currently
in South Africa, can obtain the police clearance,” says Dimairho’s affidavit.
“The 29 November 2021
decision for this reason alone cannot be complied with by many ZEP holders
currently in the Republic.”
Many ZEP holders are either
in Zimbabwe or planning to go home for the festive season. The 10-day
quarantine period in force in Zimbabwe prevents them from obtaining police
clearance before the expiry of the ZEP at the end of December.
Rock and a hard place
Home Affairs says it will
only consider applications for permanent residence from January 2022.
A further problem for ZEP
holders is that Home Affairs has not explained what it means by “mainstream
visas” or whether permanent residence permits fall under this category.
The effect of the latest
directive by Home Affairs is to prevent ZEP holders from making applications
for permanent residence before December 31. “The intention by the respondents
is to herd ZEP holders to apply for any visa or permit, beside permanent
residence,” says the court application.
“According to the 29
November 2021 directive from [the director-general of Home Affairs], ZEP
holders are expected to consider their legal options provided for by the
Immigration Act and the Immigration Regulations, make a decision that impacts
their future and that of their families, and then make an informed decision,
all in a matter of weeks, at the risk of potential deportation if the direction
they elect is wrong.
“This is indefensible. It
is absurd. It is cruel. It is inhuman. It is punitive in nature. It is
irrational, unreasonable, and unfair.”
Further complications
Advocate Simba Chitando,
who is representing the applicants in the case, says the unreasonable time
limits imposed on ZEP holders to apply for alternative visas also makes no
allowance for the funds required to do this.
“Many have had their papers
destroyed during several incidents of xenophobic violence, and some are working
in remote areas and are completely unaware of the directive issued by Home
Affairs on 29 November.”
“[The Home Affairs]
decision effectively herds 180 000 human beings, together with indirectly
affected relatives, arbitrarily, with a few weeks’ notice, to a legal regime
that changes their lives, in the most unfriendly and inhumane manner, knowing
that the decision they take, if unsuccessful, could lead to the loss of jobs,
break up of families, financial ruin, and even their deportation,” says
Dimairho.
The decision by Home
Affairs has plunged ZEP holders into a state of anxiety as they face the very
real possibility of losing their jobs, having their bank accounts closed and
being deported.
The ZEP Holders Association
is asking the court to set aside the November 29 directive by Home Affairs and
the cabinet.
www.samigration.com