South Africa has finally
done the right thing by rescinding the visa of Guus Kouwenhoven, a Dutch
citizen convicted of aiding and abetting war crimes committed by Charles
Taylor’s forces in Liberia and Guinea. It is now time for the Extractive
Industries Transparency Initiative to do likewise.
It was revealed on 12
November that the Department of Home Affairs has cancelled the visa of Guus
Kouwenhoven, a Dutch citizen sentenced to 19 years in jail in the Netherlands
for aiding and abetting war crimes committed by Charles Taylor’s forces in
Liberia and Guinea. Kouwenhoven, a notorious arms dealer and alleged sometime
business partner of Taylor’s, has been declared an “undesirable person” by the
department.
He was informed of the
decision on 5 November. He has 10 days to make representations, after which he
will become an illegal foreigner – and subjected to removal procedures, ending
his luxurious way of life in Cape Town, where he owns a multimillion-rand
Bantry Bay mansion and several expensive cars.
His highly paid legal team
will no doubt attempt to ensure he remains in the country. The department must
remain resolute and ensure South Africa no longer provides a haven for this
odious fugitive from justice. How they granted a visa to a known convicted war criminal
fleeing justice in the first place, is unclear and a cause for concern.
Equally baffling was a
magistrate’s decision in February this year to stop
Kouwenhoven’s extradition to the Netherlands, where he is due to
start serving his jail term. The National Prosecuting Authority’s appeal on the
extradition matter is due to be heard in early December. The Department of Home
Affairs’ decision should make the success of this appeal a foregone conclusion.
It is hoped that the NPA
will also seek to freeze Kouwenhoven’s assets in South Africa, sending an
unequivocal message that, as a democratic state committed to the international
rule of law, South Africa will not harbour those who have been found guilty of
complicity in heinous war crimes, or fugitives from legitimate justice. The
country’s reputation as a champion of global human rights is at stake.
South African civil
society, in the form of the Southern African Litigation Centre which brought
these cases and has run a relentless and courageous campaign against
Kouwenhoven’s presence in the country, has stepped in where the government had
so far failed. It is now up to the State to ensure we are rid of Kouwenhoven
once and for all.
Elsewhere, civil society
has not been as admirable in its approach to the arms dealer. The Oslo-based
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), which describes itself as
“the global standard for the good governance of oil, gas and mineral
resources”, has had a representative of a Kouwenhoven logging company on its oversight
body in the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) since March 2019, despite
understandable outrage.
To have the interests of a
convicted accessory to war crimes – a fugitive from justice – represented on
the stakeholder group of a body that exists to further good governance, raises
cacophonous alarm bells.
Before his luxurious
sojourn in South Africa, the kleptocracy run by President Denis Sassou Nguesso
in the Republic of Congo welcomed Kouwenhoven with open arms in 2003. This was
when, in violation of a UN Security Council travel ban, Kouwenhoven fled the
ashes of Charles Taylor’s reign of terror in Liberia, from which the
“businessman” had made fortunes from logging and arms dealing. Interpol calls
the Bantry Bay fugitive a “friend” of Sassou. In 2005, Dutch media reported
that his Pointe-Noire villa neighboured the dictator’s.
The Sassou regime awarded
him his first, massive logging concession in 2004. At the time, the other
shareholder of his firm SIPAM was soon-to-be Public Works Minister, Emile Ouosso.
When, in 2016, he gained an even larger concession – bringing the forest under
his control to an area the size of some 200,000 football fields – SIPAM had
become a wholly Kouwenhoven-owned entity.
The global NGO transparency
initiative didn’t bat an eyelid last March when Congo’s Finance Minister
appointed the local manager of SIPAM to the “multi-stakeholder group” in charge
of overseeing EITI operations in the country.
Negligence in such matters
comes naturally to the initiative. Although the non-profit claims to be the
global standard of good governance on natural resources, many of the world’s
most brutal kleptocracies may well see it as an invaluable image-laundering
tool. Of the 22 African countries it’s “assessed”, all have made either
“meaningful” or “satisfactory” progress – only one, the Central African
Republic, is currently suspended, “due to political instability”.
Such marvels of openness
and good governance as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Chad, Cameroon or
Sassou’s Republic of the Congo (Brazzaville) – and especially the multinational
mafias that plunder them – know they can count on the NGO for lauding baby
steps and window dressing. This is perhaps unsurprising given that, in 2019,
34% of the EITI Secretariat’s $6.8-million budget came from oil and mining
firms.
The way that EITI has dealt
with the Kouwenhoven issue has been as slow and laboured as the South African
government’s reaction to his gilded presence in the country.
Alerted on 3 April that
Kouwenhoven’s man was a member of its Congolese oversight group, EITI’s initial
reaction – for six months – was to do nothing.
To be sure, the executive
director promptly outlined for us the relevant grievance procedures, noting
that “any member of the [multi-stakeholder group] has the right to table an
issue for discussion”. A relief, one imagines, for the group’s civil society
members, no doubt eager to “table” the issue of Kouwenhoven while looking down
the barrel of an AK-47. A follow-up request about whether the EITI board had
brought the matter to the attention of the group was met with silence.
Not only did EITI find that
“the Republic of Congo’s performance in implementing EITI requirements [since
2018] has improved markedly” but it specifically noted “improvements” in the
procedure for naming members to the multi-stakeholder group. For the EITI, an
oversight group with a member linked to one of the most notorious war criminals
on Earth, a fugitive from justice, “includes relevant actors with adequate
representation of key stakeholders”.
On 24 September, having
heard from the authors on this again, EITI suggested a Zoom call “to better
understand your concern”. But what’s not to understand? It’s above all to this
question that EITI Congo Brazzaville’s national coordinator, Michel Okoko,
failed to respond during our online meeting on 5 October. Described recently by
La Lettre du Continent as “Sassou’s secret weapon to win over the IMF,”
Okoko has spent the past seventeen years as an adviser to the Economy
Ministry.
Not only does he claim not
to know Kouwenhoven, he swears that before our alert to EITI he had never even
heard of him. This is bizarre, given that Kouwenhoven is identified as sole
owner of SIPAM in a 2019 document on the Finance Ministry website and that he
often appeared on state television and other Congolese media. While meeting
with Kouwenhoven for a 2019 media profile, the writer recorded that during the
interview “every now and then a [Republic of Congo] minister calls”.
The EITI Secretariat
promised to recommend SIPAM’s removal from the multi-stakeholder group – only
if the necessary documentation could be found proving a connection with
Kouwenhoven. Okoko says he’s learned from SIPAM that the convicted war criminal
no longer owns it. However, in giving the regime its hearty thumbs-up last
September, EITI took pains to specify that beneficial ownership of “licenses
and contracts” was an area in which progress was “only encouraged or
recommended and should not be taken into account in assessing
compliance”.
South Africa has finally
done the right thing. It is now time for the EITI to do likewise. Otherwise it
is most likely that once he has exhausted legal challenges to his removal from
South Africa, Guus Kouwenhoven will land up once again in the Republic of Congo,
rather than in a jail cell in the Netherlands, where he belongs.
www.samigration.com