Which countries can South Africans work in without a visa?

Which countries can South Africans work in without a visa?

Pollical Analysis – 07 September 2022

Many South Africans are grasping at the opportunity to work abroad given the lack of employment in the country, work permits, and visas, which are likely mandatory requirements.

Employment in South Africa is in a dire state and many citizens have never worked a day in their lives. South Africa is in an employment crisis and the state of the economy has not made it any easier, as many companies cannot afford to employ citizens or keep employees.

Unemployment can be especially difficult in a country where you can be fully qualified but struggle to get a job. Circumstances like these have led to many South Africans resorting to seeking opportunities outside of the country, for a better means of life and financial security.

Working outside of South Africa

Due to the country’s crisis and struggle to improve the state of the employment crisis, many South Africans are seeking job opportunities outside of the country. A large number of South Africans have secured employment opportunities in countries overseas, whether these are remote while they are living in South Africa, or by relocating to the country of employment.

The process of emigrating to another country for work is long and needs thorough preparation, so many South African citizens looking for employment overseas will have questions. Especially regarding the importance of visas and work permits and whether there are countries where South Africans can work without a visa.

Which countries can South Africans work in without a visa?

There are a little over 100 countries that South Africans can travel to without a visa to enter that country. These countries generally allow South Africans to enter without a visa, but only for set periods of time. For instance, if a South African visits Argentina, they are permitted to stay in the country without a visa for a maximum of 90 days. However, this only applies to South Africans who are visiting for leisurely travel purposes, not for work.

If a South African has secured employment in another country, then it is likely that they will need a work visa or work permit. This is because unlike visiting, working in a foreign country often requires an extended stay, which then makes it mandatory for a South African to have a visa that allows them to work in that country. Even when it comes to visa-free countries, South Africans should never assume that they can stay beyond their allowance period for work and should ensure that they inquire about whether they need them to apply for a work visa or work permit to remain in a country for work purposes.

How can South Africans successfully secure work overseas?

To be successful in your search for employment overseas and actually move abroad, you need to possess the necessary skills or qualifications to secure your work permit for the job in that country. The key lies in what you can offer that deems you qualified for the job, more than the own country’s prospective candidates. Without the adequate skills and degree(s), it may be difficult for any employer to help you get a working permit. Being the perfect person for the job opens up greater opportunities for sponsorship and securing a work permit.

Countries that allow South Africans to work on a digital nomad visa

Some South Africans work remotely for companies overseas, but they are also travelling a lot for extended periods. Remote work opportunities made it a bit easy for some people to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic but with travel open again, many started working remotely while traveling.

Certain countries allow South Africans to live abroad while working.

Country

Requirements

The Bahamas

  • Offers an extended stay visa for one year
  • A mandatory visa is needed on top of the digital nomad visa
  • Employment proof should be presented
  • Payment of R17 000 is needed for the digital nomad visa

Dubai

  • Live and work in the country for one year under the new virtual working programme
  • Submit proof of employment of R85 000 per month
  • Have valid health insurance

Norway

  • Live in the country for up to two years under the independent contractor visa
  • Provide proof of business outside of Norway
  • Applicants must be earning at least R610 000 annually

Mauritius

  • Premium visa for long stays is offered
  • Stay up to one year and renew at no cost
  • Applicants do not enter the Mauritian labour market and income and profits should remain outside the country
  • Supply documentary evidence with the application

Countries that South Africans can enter for a visa free period

Country

Time period

Angola

30 days

Barbados

six months

Costa Rica

90 days

Dominican Republic

90 days

Hong Kong

90 days

Thailand

30 days

Peru

180 days

 

www.samigration.com

 

SA’s immigration crisis needs tough but rational solutions – here are a few

SA’s immigration crisis needs tough but rational solutions – here are a few

Daily Maverick – 07 September 2022

Limpopo Health MEC Phophi Ramathuba has made news for admonishing a sick Zimbabwean patient at a government hospital. The incident sparked a mostly vitriolic debate, almost all aspects of which have demonstrated a general state of brokenness from which we will not recover unless we are honest and systematic in our approach.

 Immigration is a very serious issue, which the ANC government has mishandled for a long time. It is now likely to become a cheap but dangerous vote-catching net for populist demagogues with no lawful, practical solutions. It is also increasingly likely that we are just one incident away from an orgy of violence against foreign nationals, Zimbabweans in particular.

Before I propose a few practical steps towards a solution, it is important to place a few issues on the table, as avoiding them will perpetuate an unprincipled discourse, such as what we now have.

Admonishing a sick person – especially while being recorded for later public spectacle – is inconsistent with respecting the dignity of all persons, South African or not. It may speak to our deepest frustrations about the state of the country, but the responsibility of leadership means those entrusted with positions of power and influence must be careful to not behave in a manner that changes for the worse, the very moral character of our nation.

I do not want to live in a country whose people will one day celebrate when a human being is left to die in the corridors of a hospital because they are an undocumented, foreign national. Such a prospect may cause some people satisfaction, but it would simultaneously dehumanise the officials tasked with ignoring people dying right next to them. 

It also invokes painful memories of the way black patients are often treated by nurses at many of our public hospitals. There are even satirical TikTok videos where young people display the same uncaring attitude as that displayed by Ramathuba. We must reflect on whether these daily humiliations have not transformed some of us into the very thing we detest.

It is common cause that most of the hostility is directed towards Zimbabweans. We did not get to this intense anti-Zimbabwean sentiment by accident. This situation was created through political and moral dishonesty, as well as deeply embedded corruption and incompetence over a period of about 20 years.

The crisis of state brutality and repression in Zimbabwe exploded into the global spotlight in the late 1990s when students hit the streets in protest, later followed by trade unions. By the early 2000s, there was pressure on South Africa – as the de facto democratic “light on the hill” – to take the lead in resolving the issue. Instead, the government of President Thabo Mbeki expended significant energy denying the existence of a crisis and admonishing anyone who proposed there was one.

It was at this time that he uttered the now infamous, “Crisis? What crisis?” This, as Zimbabweans fled across the border in their droves as beatings, detention, torture and extrajudicial killings became par for the course. I recall vividly some of the local debate when the late Morgan Tsvangirai came out of police detention swollen, limping badly and wearing torn clothes. 

For leading the fight for a political alternative in Zimbabwe, he was branded “a puppet of the West” who apparently deserved, along with thousands of his supporters, to be brutalised. Some locals even cheered as this occurred alongside farm invasions.

Around 2003, a large Cosatu delegation was evicted from Zimbabwe and not allowed to conduct its fact-finding mission. The current chairman of the ANC, Gwede Mantashe, then general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers, and Zwelinzima Vavi were in that delegation. For the rest of the tripartite alliance, it was convenient for them to pretend the crisis did not exist.

Political choices have consequences, and the complaint we now hear about there being “too many Zimbabweans” in South Africa is partly of our own making through wilful ignorance and dishonest brokering. 

Zimbabweans did not fall from the sky for no reason at all. We saw this coming and chose to look away, and for that we must take responsibility and seek solutions more honestly than we have before.

This is not to suggest that South Africa must wage a democratic struggle on behalf of Zimbabweans, but it is also dishonest to engage in fake neutrality that effectively perpetuates and legitimises the injustice and then cry like a spoilt baby when the chickens come home to roost. 

What we complain about in respect of Zimbabweans will come to pass in the case of Swatis, who are also suffering under terrible repression by their king while we play dictatorship pal, as our government is prone to do.  

Steps towards a solution

In my view, there are a few difficult steps that need to be taken. The first is to change the tone of engagement with the Zimbabwean government from one of slavish persuasion to one seeking to solve what has become a potentially explosive internal driver of instability in South Africa. 

We must make it clear that normal relations cannot continue between Zimbabwe and South Africa, with the latter having to shoulder the fallout of repression and misrule. If our offer to broker a real democratic solution is rejected, we must distance ourselves from that government.

Second, we must invest in border control and security. Expelling migrants who will simply walk back in a few weeks later is an exercise in futility. To do this effectively, we must also accept that the SANDF is weak and unable to perform its most basic functions, while the police force is riddled with corruption. Reforming and recapacitating both are key to effective border control and security.

Third, we must fix our broken immigration system. In addition to porous borders, the processing of asylum and other applications are an absolute abortion. Applications for highly skilled worker permits take forever, while low-skills roles in various sectors are filled by non-South Africans – it boggles the mind how the latter are processed so quickly while key skills are caught in a gridlock. 

The situation is even more ridiculous with business visas, where, for instance, highly skilled Kenyans coming here on business are frequently treated like criminals and given limited period visas, while criminals and terrorists simply walk in and stay.

Fourth, we must begin a massive initiative of normalisation of immigrants – “normalisation” in the sense that every undocumented migrant must be given a timeframe in which to register and make a formal application for citizenship, work permit or asylum. This must be prefaced by a proper administrative system and capacity to make this happen as quickly as possible.

Such an effort must be pragmatic and humane, and take account of situations where undocumented migrants have intermarried and have children who know no country other than South Africa. Other countries have had to deal with the same. 

Anyone who does not qualify on a range of criteria can be deported to then apply from their home country but, as stated earlier, this cannot work if the borders are porous.

Fifth, South Africa’s labour laws must be applied as required by statute.

People who secure work permits must either be highly skilled workers or refugees in terms of international and domestic law. The chaos we see where we can’t tell who falls within which category is merely a symptom of how the endemic corruption, neglect and incompetence of the past 15 years have decimated the civil service.

Uncontrolled immigration and related crimes are not a sign of disrespectful Zimbabweans and other nationals, but a symptom of a broken, corrupt state that has driven the economy to the brink of collapse and allowed crime to fester. A desperate South African population looking for jobs to put food on the table, and under siege from rampant crime, will inevitably resort to some form of vigilantism. 

That means accepting the same level of responsibility we demand that Zimbabweans do in their own country, where we blame them for re-electing Zanu-PF. We do the same with the ANC here and expect to get a different outcome. 

Ultimately, all these problems and solutions need a political class that fully appreciates its strategic challenges and has the capacity to deal with them instead of making populist interventions for cheap political points, while doing little or nothing to move the needle on any of them.

Far from being a hero, Phophi Ramathuba is a very public face of the incapacity we rely on – and that is untenable

www.samigration.com

 


Home affairs has dropped central adjudication of visas, after months of complaints

Home affairs has dropped central adjudication of visas, after months of complaints

Business Insider SA – 07 September 2022

  • The department of home affairs has reversed a decision to centralise the adjudication of long-term visas.
  • That plan lasted for only a couple of months, and did not go at all well.
  • Embassies – previously accused of sometimes endangering national security or harming the economy – are now back in charge.

As of 1 September, South Africa is no longer centralising the adjudication of long-term visas, the department of home affairs (DHA) confirmed on Tuesday.

That brings to an end a fraught six-month period for those who applied for such visas, previously handled by individual South African missions abroad, and makes consular officials responsible again for deciding who is let in to South Africa

Visa specialists Xpatweb first noted the reversal on the weekend, saying it expected an announcement from the department on the transitional arrangement for visas already in process.

The DHA told Business Insider South Africa only that it "did issue a new directive which came into effect on Thursday 01 September 2022". It did not provide a copy of the directive, despite repeated requests, and has made no public statement on the matter.

Extreme delays in issuing such visas – with delays facilitation companies described as unprecedented – have been a significant headache for foreign companies investing and doing business in South Africa, Business Leadership SA CEO Busisiwe Mavuso told the News24 On The Record conference on Thursday, the same day the reversal came into effect.

WATCH: Home affairs officials caught on their phones as people queue to be helped

The Department of Home Affairs has said it will investigate after officials were filmed using their cellphones while on duty. Video footage of two officials on their phones at the Tongaat office in KwaZulu-Natal was widely circulated on social media. In the video members of the public can be seen waiting to be helped. Acting home affairs director general Thulani Mavuso has...

Those affected have included companies that signed up to President Cyril Ramaphosa's investment drive, but have since said delays nearing a year in processing work visas for critical foreign staff meant they could not start work.

Some companies expressed acute frustration because they could find no way to reach a department official who could provide even a vague prediction of how long a visa would take – or who could even confirm that a visa application had been accepted as properly lodged – making it impossible to plan moves for employees who needed to secure places in schools for children and move their households across oceans. 

Until Thursday, all work visa applications with a duration of more than three months had to be sent to Pretoria for a decision by the director general of the DHA, in an effort to create consistency – and prevent corruption. Visa facilitators said missions were told the DHA was concerned about reports of arbitrary demands for documents, with the implication that these were subtle solicitations for bribes. They were also told that only central decision-making could balance the need for national security with the need to allow foreign investors to move with speed.

But centralisation was a disaster. Visas that previously took between four and eight weeks to issue suddenly took a minimum of 12 weeks – and consultants reported that the reality was closer to eight months.

Their clients, those consultants said, could not wait that long, and would simply take their business to another country.

Visa facilitation companies believe the consular service divisions of missions – still fully staffed to process visas – may now be able to bring turnaround times down to as low as two weeks.

www.samigration.com

 


Zimbabwe special permit: Less than 4% have made representations to govt - home affairs dept

Zimbabwe special permit: Less than 4% have made representations to govt - home affairs dept

 

News24 – 7 September 2022

  • Of the 178 000 Zimbabwe Exemption Permit holders in South Africa, about 6 000 made representations to say why their permits should not be terminated.  
  • The Helen Suzman Foundation has taken the government to court for discontinuing the permits.
  • The permits expired in December 2021 but were renewed for 12 months.

Less than four percent of Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) holders have made representations to the Department of Home Affairs to say why their documents should not be terminated later this year.

This emerged in court papers the department filed at the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.

The ZEP is a special dispensation permit that was established more than 10 years ago, providing legal protection to an estimated 178 000 Zimbabweans who live, work and study in South Africa.

In January, Cabinet decided that the arrangement should be terminated by December and that permit holders should apply for a visa to remain in South Africa on the basis of a list of critical skills.

In the case before court, the department said in its papers that only 6 000 out of the 178 000 permit holders responded to the call Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi's made last year for Zimbabweans to state their case before the dispensation lapses.

In June, the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF) said it would take the government to court for discontinuing the permits, saying that the decision would turn ZEP holders in South Africa into undocumented migrants and force them to return.

It said affected Zimbabweans would face similar conditions to what led them to flee from their home countries.

However, in the court papers, Home Affairs director-general Livhuwani Tommy Makhode said the minister had allowed ZEP holders to apply for visas as contemplated by the Immigration Act.

Makhode said a decision not to grant further exemptions hadn't been made.

He said: 

This is clear from the fact that ZEP holders are entitled to and were invited to make representations as to why their ZEPs should not be terminated and/or why their ZEPs should be extended for a period longer than [the] 12-month extension granted by the minister.

He said the only decision HSF could adequately seek to challenge was the minister's decision to extend the ZEPs for 12 months.

"If regard is had to the grounds of review, it is clear that HSF contends that because ZEP holders have lived and worked in South Africa for approximately a decade, any decision not to grant a further blanket exemption to all ZEP holders would amount to an unjustifiable breach of the fundamental rights of ZEP holders.

"In the six-month period since the minister's decision to extend the ZEPs for 12 months was announced, only 6 000 of the approximately 178 000 ZEP holders have taken the opportunity to make representations to the minister," he said.

Makhode added the relief sought was "legally unsustainable" and added that any ZEP holder who meets the requirements of Section 26 of the Immigration Act was entitled to apply for permanent residence on any of the grounds contained in that section.

WATCH | Podcast companion: The Story of Joseph Dhafana

Joseph Dhafana is one of the thousands of Zimbabweans who hold a Zimbabwean Exemption Permit. He has until the end of this year to migrate to another permit, but if his application for a business permit is unsuccessful, he faces deportation.

"On the evidence, HSF cannot demonstrate that any application for permanent residence made in terms of s26 by ZEP holders will be rejected." 

Makhode also lambasted the HSF for not putting up evidence on how many ZEP holders intended to lodge or have lodged applications for general work visas or how many were not able to meet the requirements. 

Makhode also said it was estimated that there were more than a million undocumented Zimbabweans living in South Africa, and that an "order that declares that it is unconstitutional to deny further exemptions to ZEP holders until the Zimbabwe economy has recovered sufficiently, whatever that might mean would entitle any undocumented Zimbabweans to compel the minister to grant his/her an exemption from the provisions of the Immigration Act because of the economic situation in that country". 

He said this, in turn, would establish a right to remain in the country for economic migrants who do not meet the requirements for asylum.

www.samigration.com

 

 

 


Home affairs has dropped central adjudication of visas, after months of complaints

Home affairs has dropped central adjudication of visas, after months of complaints

Business Insider SA – 06 September 2022

  • The department of home affairs has reversed a decision to centralise the adjudication of long-term visas.
  • That plan lasted for only a couple of months, and did not go at all well.
  • Embassies – previously accused of sometimes endangering national security or harming the economy – are now back in charge.

As of 1 September, South Africa is no longer centralising the adjudication of long-term visas, the department of home affairs (DHA) confirmed on Tuesday.

That brings to an end a fraught six-m

onth period for those who applied for such visas, previously handled by individual South African missions abroad, and makes consular officials responsible again for deciding who is let in to South Africa

Visa specialists Xpatweb first noted the reversal on the weekend, saying it expected an announcement from the department on the transitional arrangement for visas already in process.

The DHA told Business Insider South Africa only that it "did issue a new directive which came into effect on Thursday 01 September 2022". It did not provide a copy of the directive, despite repeated requests, and has made no public statement on the matter.

Extreme delays in issuing such visas – with delays facilitation companies described as unprecedented – have been a significant headache for foreign companies investing and doing business in South Africa, Business Leadership SA CEO Busisiwe Mavuso told the News24 On The Record conference on Thursday, the same day the reversal came into effect.

WATCH: Home affairs officials caught on their phones as people queue to be helped

The Department of Home Affairs has said it will investigate after officials were filmed using their cellphones while on duty. Video footage of two officials on their phones at the Tongaat office in KwaZulu-Natal was widely circulated on social media. In the video members of the public can be seen waiting to be helped. Acting home affairs director general Thulani Mavuso has...

Those affected have included companies that signed up to President Cyril Ramaphosa's investment drive, but have since said delays nearing a year in processing work visas for critical foreign staff meant they could not start work.

Some companies expressed acute frustration because they could find no way to reach a department official who could provide even a vague prediction of how long a visa would take – or who could even confirm that a visa application had been accepted as properly lodged – making it impossible to plan moves for employees who needed to secure places in schools for children and move their households across oceans. 

Until Thursday, all work visa applications with a duration of more than three months had to be sent to Pretoria for a decision by the director general of the DHA, in an effort to create consistency – and prevent corruption. Visa facilitators said missions were told the DHA was concerned about reports of arbitrary demands for documents, with the implication that these were subtle solicitations for bribes. They were also told that only central decision-making could balance the need for national security with the need to allow foreign investors to move with speed.

But centralisation was a disaster. Visas that previously took between four and eight weeks to issue suddenly took a minimum of 12 weeks – and consultants reported that the reality was closer to eight months.

Their clients, those consultants said, could not wait that long, and would simply take their business to another country.

Visa facilitation companies believe the consular service divisions of missions – still fully staffed to process visas – may now be able to bring turnaround times down to as low as two weeks.

www.samigration.com