VFS Global issues update on visa application operations in India

VFS Global, the visa outsourcing and technology services company, has issued an update on restarting visa application services in India since June 2020.

Currently, the visa application process (in various categories) for over 40 governments has resumed at select visa application centres across India.

“Our Visa Application Centres across India remain open as of April 7, 2021, though timings and days of working may vary, according to pandemic-related regulations. Please check vfsglobal.com for details. Real-time updates are also posted on our social media channels and the Covid-19 Customer Advisories page,” VFS Global said in an official release.

Following is the information on visa operations as of March 31, 2021:

Country

Visa Categories

Cities

Restart Date

Austria

Category D and pre-approved C visa applications

Mumbai, Kochi, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – September 2020

Belarus

All Visa Categories

Mumbai and New Delhi

July – September 2020

Belgium

Category D and pre-approved C type

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Kochi, Hyderabad, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – August 2020

Canada

Family, Permits, Students

Mumbai, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Jalandhar, Chandigarh and Kolkata

November – December 2020

China

Business Category

New Delhi

July-20

Croatia

Category D

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – September 2020

Cyprus

C visa categories (Pre-approved from High Commission)

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Kochi, Hyderabad and New Delhi

October – November 2020

Czech Republic

Czech and EU family members, Entry in the interest of the Czech Republic, International Transport workers, Diplomats and Officials of International organizations, Seasonal workers, For employment in health and social services only, in urgent emergencies, for employment – food production workers only, for employment – qualified workers only (if the conditions of these Programs “The High qualified worker” and “The Key and scientific workers” are met)

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Kochi and Hyderabad

September-20 –
February-21

Denmark

Residence permit, Employment, Dependent, Approval cases, Category D, specific purpose (business, etc.)

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Kochi, New Delhi and Kolkata

June – September  2020

Dominican Republic

Business, Work and Resident visa

New Delhi, Mumbai

June 2020

Estonia

Category C and D

Mumbai, Kochi, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – August 2020

Finland

Resident Permits, Visas (Pre-approved from Embassy)

New Delhi

November 2020

France

Category C and D

Mumbai, Chennai, Kochi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, New Delhi and Kolkata

August-20

Georgia

Long Term Visa for Business and Family visit (post approval from Ministry) and student visa

be accepted

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Kochi, New Delhi and Kolkata

October-20

Germany

Category C (with prior approval) and D visa (seafarers, transit, employment and student, Blue Card, PhD) after approval of submission and D-visa stamping

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kochi, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – August 2020

Hungary

Pre-approved cases from embassy

New Delhi

November 2020

Italy

Re-Entry Visa, Category D, Short term Students, Seafarer, Transit, Visit to family (immediate family member), Business (With prior approval)

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kochi, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

July-20

Ireland

Student, Long – stay categories

Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kochi, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Jalandhar, Chandigarh, Kolkata

July-20

Japan

Long term and Business visa

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Kochi, and New Delhi

September – October 2020

Latvia

Category D

Mumbai, Kochi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai and New Delhi

August 2020

Lebanon

All Visa Categories (BAU)

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, New Delhi and Kolkata

December-20

Lithuania

Category D

Mumbai, Kochi, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

August 2020

Luxembourg

Category D

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Kochi, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – September 2020

Malta

Pre-approved case for Medical Staff, Humanitarian case and High skilled professionals

Mumbai, Chennai, Kochi, Hyderabad

February 2021 – March 2021

Malaysia

Single Entry Visas

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad and New Delhi

July – September 2020

MEA

Attestation and Apostille of personal and educational documents

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad

September-October 2020

Morocco

All Visa Categories except tourist visas

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

January 2021

New Zealand

Long-stay and other categories (postal applications only)

New Delhi

August 2020

Nigeria

All visa categories

Mumbai

September-20

Norway

Residence permit and pre-approved Category C

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Kochi, New Delhi and Kolkata

June – September  2020

Poland

Category D

Mumbai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, New Delhi and Kolkata

July 2020

Portugal

E6 for holders of expired Portuguese residence card, D6 for holders of expired Family Reunification D6 visas, Category D and pre-approved Category C

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, New Delhi and Kolkata

June – September  2020

South Africa

All visa categories

Mumbai, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata

September – October 2020

South Korea

Seamen Short term, Work Permit (C4) and Long-term applications

New Delhi, Kolkata

June 2020 – March 2021

Sweden

As per Embassy’s Approval

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, New Delhi and Kolkata

October-November 2020

Switzerland

Category D and pre-approved Category C

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Kochi, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – August 2020

Thailand

All visa categories

Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru, Kochi and Hyderabad

December 2020 – January 2021

The Netherlands

Seaman, LDR, Re-entry visa, Orange carpet/ Business (With prior approval)

Mumbai,  Hyderabad, Chennai, New Delhi and Kolkata

July – September 2020

Turkey

All visa categories

Mumbai, Hyderabad, Kochi, Chennai, Bengaluru and New Delhi

June – September  2020

UAE – DVPC

All visa categories (online); 30 day and 90 day tourist visas (in- VAC)

Online application in Hyderabad, Chennai, Bengaluru and Kochi

June – August 2020

United Kingdom

All Visa categories / passport collection

Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kochi, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Jalandhar, Chandigarh, Kolkata, and Goa (once a month only)

July-20

Ukraine

All visas except tourist

Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, New Delhi and Kolkata,

August 2020 / September 2020

USA

All visa categories

All India

August 2020 – February 2021

Note: Air travel on all routes is subject to government advisories and permissions for air travel may be independent of the visa process.

VFS Global has established standardised protective measures to be followed across centres, including physical distancing and sanitisation, body temperature checks, use of masks and sanitisers, disinfecting high-contact surfaces. Customers with Covid-19 symptoms, including high fever, cough and difficulty in breathing will not be permitted to enter the centre

www.samigration.com


Why do South African students fare worse at maths than their counterparts in other countries?

South African students are bad at maths compared to other countries. This is clear from results of South African learners in the International Mathematics and Science Study. The results show that South Africa’s performance is far from competitive in relation to other countries.

To try and understand the reasons for this poor performance, I did a qualitative case study focusing on a year-long post graduate course taken by aspiring teachers. I focused particularly on a Post Graduate Certificate in Education with a maths focus offered by one of the country’s university of technologies.

I looked at three key themes – the curriculum and its delivery, partnerships during delivery and policy influencing delivery. My research findings show that the success of the Post Graduate Certificate in Education in preparing maths teachers is not without concern and its delivery, in the case study context, needs rethinking.

My findings underscore earlier research that has suggested that a shortage of competent and confident qualified mathematics teachers is a key contributing factor to the low maths performance of South African school children.

Constraints

The one-year Post Graduate Certificate in Education offered at South African universities is a key qualification for aspiring teachers. This is taken after completing a diploma or degree in other fields such as engineering, business and hospitality. It offers an opportunity to university graduates to become a professionally qualified teacher in one-year instead of pursuing a career in industry.

My research highlights the constraints identified by students and lecturers of the post graduate certificate programme, in particular as it relates to the teaching of maths.

The first constraint I identified involved inadequate support structures as well as information, communication and technology infrastructure to meaningfully support the ever-increasing numbers of students taking up the course. The numbers have grown exponentially – from 10 in 1994 to 100 in 2014 and then 207 in 2015. In short, the university has been expected to do more with less.

The second constraint I identified was a potential over reliance on using Bachelors in Education content designed to be delivered over four years. This was evident from the statements from lecturers clarifying how they identify and select content to present during lectures.

This is a constraint as the four year Bachelors in Education content is not always suitable for the Post Graduate Certificate in Education context. This indicates a need to develop context specific content to make the best of the one-year post graduate certificate.

The third constraint was a limited partnership to develop professional learning communities. These should ideally involve lecturers and students, university representatives evaluating students during compulsory classroom teaching periods and the teachers in schools hosting students.

The main reason for this constraint appeared to be that most lecturers were part-time as the course was offered in the afternoon or evening. This meant that lecturers and students had limited time to engage. This affected the outcomes and the quality of the course.

Another outcome from the lack of engagement between the part-time lecturers was that lecturers duplicated content offered in other programme modules. Students and graduates noted this as one of their main concerns. Unnecessary duplication is a major problem because the post graduate certificate programme has a limited time-frame of just one year.

The fourth and final constraint was a lack of oversight over university policy stipulations linked to the delivery and assessment of the post graduate qualification.

For example, university policy stipulates that an assessment plan, programme and calendar must be provided to students. Such a document wasn’t provided to students as noted during interviews. Policy also stipulates that students must re-do practical teaching if they miss more than five days during the study period. One student noted that he was absent for a whole week during this period and no one noticed. He was awarded a pass for practical teaching.

My research found that lecturers didn’t follow all the university’s policies. This suggested that they weren’t being monitored by the relevant authorities. This lack of oversight by the university is clearly a major problem.

Next steps

I conclude from my findings that, to become confident and competent maths teachers, graduates who have passed the Post Graduate Certificate in Education need further development and support. If this isn’t provided, South Africa is unlikely to see an improvement in the performance of its school children.

 


Motsoaledi's statements on Atul Gupta's SA passport request are 'legally flawed', says lawyer

Atul Gupta is seeking to have his South African passport issued.

 

The Department of Home Affairs is opposing the application

 

Gupta's legal team has filed a court application, seeking an order ompelling the director-general and home affairs minister to furnish     his record of decision for refusing the passport.

 

The lawyer representing one of the Gupta brothers has filed a fresh application, seeking an order compelling the Department of Home Affairs to file a record and reasons for its decision on its refusal to issue his client with a passport. The papers were filed in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria last week. 

 

The respondents in the matter are the director-general of home affairs and Minister Aaron Motsoaledi. Atul Gupta, who fled South Africa for Dubai amid corruption allegations,

approached the court in January in a bid to have his South African passport issued.

 

In his application, he argued that the home affairs director-general's failure to grant his passport application was unlawful and reviewable. The department is opposing the application.

 

Speaking to News24 on Tuesday, Gupta's attorney Rudi Krause said, despite Motsoaledi's public statements that his client would not be issued with a passport, he had so far not provided the record of decision.  He had also not filed an answering affidavit, Krause said.

 

Decision

 

"The minister boldly said he has taken a decision not to issue Mr Gupta with a new passport [and] now the fundamental problem is, it's not the minister's decision... it is the decision of the Director-General.

 

He said:  So, if the minister has taken that decision, we want to see on what legal basis the minister claims to have made the decision which he is not entitled to make in law. "We have found his public statement to be legally flawed," he added.

 

The main application was brought in terms of Rule 53 - which determines that an organ of state that takes an administrative decision must provide the court, upon application, with the record of decision, he said.  "So, there must be an official record of the decision that the minister took," he said.

 

Krause said:  It is just reckless of a minister to behave in this fashion. "They [the respondents] have also served us with a Rule 47 notice requiring of Mr Gupta to put up security for costs which we've told them we are not going to do.  "How can the government expect a citizen of this country who wants to exercise their constitutional right to put up security for costs? We've told them in writing, we are not going to put up security for costs. [They should ] bring an application so that we can argue this in court; they have not brought that application either." In his affidavit filed in court, on behalf of his client, Krause said: "At the time of deposing to this affidavit, the respondents have still

not filed the record of decision with the registrar. Instead the second respondent (Minister Motsoaledi) is quoted in the media as saying that he has garnered a top legal team and that he will resist any effort by the applicant to be issued with a South African passport.

 

"Despite the approach that the second respondent [minister] has taken publicly, the respondents remain in default of filing a record of decision and simply complying with the rules of the court as all parties are obliged to do."

 

Pressure

 

Krause said the DG and the minister were not only in default of compliance with the notice of motion and the rules of court, but also in contempt of court “by virtue of their flagrant disregard for the Rules of this Court”.

 

Asked for comment on the matter, spokesperson for the Home Affairs minister, Siya Qoza said: "The Department is defending the matter and is giving this application the requisite attention." 

The controversial Gupta family left South Africa for Dubai under increasing pressure due to allegations that they influenced former president Jacob Zuma's Cabinet appointments.

 

South Africa has been engaging with the United Arab Emirates for some family members and their associates' extradition.  But according to Justice Minister Ronald Lamola, the UAE was not

cooperating, News24 reported.  Meanwhile, in his application filed in January, Gupta said:

My circumstances and business activities in South Africa are well known, and it would not be inappropriate to describe myself as having a public profile. I have been the subject of speculation and reporting by the media, much of which is inaccurate. The simple factual position is that I have not been charged with any criminal offence under South African or any other law, and there had been no credible suggestion that any such charges are to be proffered against me.

 


SARS busts diplomats for allegedly selling illicit alcohol, cheating taxman out of R100m per month

533 million Facebook users' phone numbers and personal data have been leaked online

The personal data of over 500 million Facebook users has been posted online in a low-level hacking forum.

  • The data includes phone numbers, full names, location, email address, and biographical information.
  • Security researchers warn that the data could be used by hackers to impersonate people and commit fraud.

A user in a low level hacking forum has published the phone numbers and personal data of hundreds of millions of Facebook users for free online.

The exposed data includes personal information of over 533 million Facebook users from 106 countries, including over 32 million records on users in the US, 11 million on users in the UK, and 6 million on users in India. It includes their phone numbers, Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, bios, and - in some cases - email addresses.

Though South Africa is not directly listed as an affected country, millions of SA accounts appear to be affected under the designation "Africa".

Insider reviewed a sample of the leaked data and verified several records by matching known Facebook users' phone numbers with the IDs listed in the data set. We also verified records by testing email addresses from the data set in Facebook's password reset feature, which can be used to partially reveal a user's phone number.

The leaked data could provide valuable information to cybercriminals who use people's personal information to impersonate them or scam them into handing over login credentials, according to Alon Gal, CTO of cybercrime intelligence firm Hudson Rock, who first discovered the leaked data on Saturday. "A database of that size containing the private information such as phone numbers of a lot of Facebook's users would certainly lead to bad actors taking advantage of the data to perform social engineering attacks [or] hacking attempts," Gal told Insider.

Facebook did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment.

Gal first discovered the leaked data in January when a user in the same hacking forum advertised an automated bot that could provide phone numbers for hundreds of millions of Facebook users in exchange for a price. Motherboard reported on that bot's existence at the time and verified that the data was legitimate.

Now, the entire dataset has been posted on the hacking forum for free, making it widely available to anyone with rudimentary data skills.

It's not the first time that a huge number of Facebook users' phone numbers have been found exposed online. A vulnerability that was uncovered in 2019 allowed millions of people's phone numbers to be scraped from Facebook's servers in violation of its terms of service. Facebook said that vulnerability was patched in August 2019.

Facebook previously vowed to crack down on mass data-scraping after Cambridge Analytica scraped the data of 80 million users in violation of Facebook's terms of service to target voters with political ads in the 2016 election.

Gal said that, from a security standpoint, there's not much Facebook can do to help users affected by the breach since their data is already out in the open - but he added that Facebook could notify users so they could remain vigilant for possible phishing schemes or fraud using their personal data.

"Individuals signing up to a reputable company like Facebook are trusting them with their data and Facebook [is] supposed to treat the data with utmost respect," Gal said. "Users having their personal information leaked is a huge breach of trust and should be handled accordingly."

www.samigration.com