National Interest Exception Applications for International Business Travelers on the Rise

With the COVID-19 pandemic easing, Baker Donelson's Business Immigration Team is seeing an increase in demand for U.S. employer-based employment visas. However, even as we have been obtaining employment visa petition approvals at a record pace for L-1, E-2, H-1B and O-1 employees, at the same time, these and other international business visitors and employees from around the world are facing challenging COVID-19 travel restrictions. Fortunately, it may be possible for an individual otherwise covered by one of the geographic COVID-19 travel restriction proclamations to receive a National Interest Exception (NIE) to allow travel and entry to the U.S.

National Interest Exceptions for Certain Nonimmigrants and Students

On April 26, 2021, the Department of State updated its NIE page to expand certain eligibilities to China, Iran, Brazil, South Africa, Schengen Area, United Kingdom, and Ireland. Most recently, on April 30, 2021, the Department of State included India in its NIE policies.

Key eligibilities for travelers who were present in the above-listed countries include:

1. Travelers who are seeking to provide vital support for critical infrastructure; journalists; students and certain academics covered by exchange visitor programs.

Travelers in these categories who have a valid visa in the appropriate class or who have a valid Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) for travel under the Visa Waiver Program and seek to travel for purposes consistent with ESTA authorization, should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate before traveling, if they believe they may qualify for an NIE. There are 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, are considered vital to the U.S. By letter in support of the NIE application, the U.S. employer is required to describe how its business qualifies under one of the named critical infrastructure sectors, how the individual traveler's activities in the U.S. directly support the business operations, and how his or her presence in the country is essential to the ongoing success of the U.S. employer's business. It is a good idea to include a copy of organization chart that shows the applicant's position and the manager to whom he or she reports, as well as other employees he or she may supervise, if any. Any member of our Business Immigration Team can assist with questions regarding the application process.

If an NIE is approved, it is valid only for 30 days to be used for a single entry into the U.S. on either a valid visa or ESTA authorization, as appropriate.

2. Qualified travelers seeking to enter the U.S. for purposes related to humanitarian travel, public health response, and national security.

3. F-1 and M-1 Students – The updated NIE policy states, "Students and academics subject to these proclamations due to their presence in China, Iran, Brazil, or South Africa, may qualify for an NIE only if their academic program begins August 1, 2021 or later."

The Department of State (DOS) notes that the pandemic continues to limit the number of visas the U. S. embassies and consulates abroad are able to process. Until the DOS is positioned to process more visa applications, for certain reasons of business necessity, our Baker Donelson team can assist with requests for expedited visa appointments in connection with the NIE application as well. See the April 27, 2021 Department of State Media Note announcing the policy, titled Uniform Global National Interest Exceptions to COVID-19 Travel Restriction.

www.samigration.com


Zimbabwe: Home Affairs silent as 180 000 foreign nationals await permit

The four-year Zimbabwe Exemption Permit lapses in December and the South African government has not yet indicated if it will renew it.

Thousands of holders of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) are living in uncertainty because the South African government has not yet indicated whether it will renew their permits. About 180 000 Zimbabweans hold ZEPs. The four-year permit expires on 31 December 2021.

Some Zimbabweans said their banks had already warned them to renew their permits or face closure of their accounts in December.

The permits were first issued in 2010 under the Dispensation of Zimbabweans Project (ZDP). The programme was renewed in 2014 as the Zimbabwe Special Permit (ZSP), before the ZEP was introduced in 2017.

Zimbabwe nationals desperate to resolve ZEP renewals

A Zimbabwean, who we will only identify as Matthew, said he can’t make plans for the future. He is a supervisor at a restaurant and lives in New Brighton with his wife and two children. He has been living in South Africa for 20 years.

“I started with an asylum seeker permit before I got the ZDP, ZSP and the ZEP. I have lived in this country for the better part of my adult life. It will be heartbreaking if the government refuses to renew the permits.

“I have two bank accounts and insurance as well as burial policies. These will all go down the drain if the government refuses to extend the permits.”

He said he is established in the community and his children speak fluent Xhosa. “They identify themselves with local culture because they were born here,” he said.

Another ZEP holder said South Africa should grant citizenship to those who have lived legally in the country for five or more years.

“Some people have invested a lot in the country. Others have bought immovable property, which they will be forced to leave,” he said.

Home Affairs mum on ongoing delays

Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Migrants Support Network Chris Mapingure said, “We appeal to the Department of Home Affairs to issue a statement regarding the renewal of the ZEP.”

Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Exiles Forum Advocate Gabriel Shumba said he is receiving an unprecedented number of enquiries from concerned permit holders.

“It is an issue that seriously affects thousands of Zimbabweans, especially with some banks threatening to close accounts.”

www.samigration.com


Who wants to buy a visa? Comparing the uptake of residence by investment programmes in the European Union

Residence by investment programmes are available in several EU countries. These programmes grant visas in return for investments in specified areas. Drawing on a new study, Kristin Surak examines the uptake of these programmes across the EU, the characteristics of applicants, and the nature of their investments.

Who wants to buy a visa? The spread of so-called golden visa programmes over the past decade has raised many questions about these opportunities to gain a residence permit – for those who can afford it. All one needs to do is park around €250,000 or so in a specified investment area – usually real estate, bank deposits, or government bonds – and go through a standard application process, which can take just a few weeks. Spouses, children, and sometimes even parents can be included on the application, securing residence benefits for the whole family. Such programmes can be found around the world and are quite common in Europe, where half of all EU member states host them.

These options are attractive for several reasons: they secure the right to reside in the issuing country, they may bring a return on the investment, and they bring travel benefits within the wider Union. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, too, a new bonus has been noted as well: the opportunity to enter Europe even when borders are raised. The work-around has not been lost on wealthy Americans who saw their mobility options plummet during the height of travel restrictions. For much of 2020, an eagle-embossed blue passport was simply not enough to get into many countries. But because most EU member states allowed both their citizens and their residents to return, a golden visa could have done the trick in many places.

But who participates in these programmes? A lot of questions have been asked about benefits, risks, and even security issues around golden visa schemes, but without systematic quantitative research on programme uptake, such assessments remain speculative. In a recent study, I use new data to look into who and how many go for these options, which have been available in fourteen EU member states, including the UK before Brexit.

Across time, EU countries have approved around 40,000 applications for golden visas. However, the actual number of people gaining residence permits is much greater since each application includes an average 1.6 family members in addition to the investor. As such, over 100,000 people have gained EU residence through them. Yet within the Union as a whole, this represents a tiny proportion – about 1 percent or less – of longer-stay residence permits issued. As such, they’re not a very prominent way of gaining access to Europe. Nonetheless, smaller countries with popular schemes, like Greece and Portugal, can find that their golden visa programme accounts for more than 10 percent of resident permits issued in recent years.

If fourteen EU member states have – or have had – programmes, not all have seen similar uptake. Some places, like Estonia, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, have welcomed fewer than a dozen people in total through these measures, and most countries with programmes approve fewer than 500 applications annually. Instead, interest is concentrated on just a handful of options: in particular, Portugal, Spain, Latvia, and Greece. These four countries have accounted for 70 percent of all approved applications and almost 60 percent of all revenue generated.

Where do the investors come from? Almost 50 percent are Chinese, followed by Russians who constitute around one-quarter of the participants. Both countries saw the growth of substantial private wealth during the transition from communist to capitalist systems under continuing autocratic rule – a combination that stokes interest in investment migration options. Outside these two behemoths, the most popular countries of origin read as a list of political hotspots: Brazil, Turkey, Ukraine, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq. This finding aligns with research on demand for citizenship by investment programmes that shows that many investors see their new documents as an insurance policy or a way to hedge risks. Furthermore, demand is patterned by colonial connections: Portugal sees a disproportionate number of Brazilians, as does Greece with Turks and Latvia with Russians.

Migration is often a family decision, and the mobility opportunities offered by golden visa programmes are no different, with an average of 1.6 family members added to each application – a number that is growing. Indeed, some countries have expanded their family reunion provisions to draw in more investors. The result is that significantly more people gain residence than investment monies brought in. Yet these are still noteworthy, with the programmes now attracting over €3 billion annually to the EU. The most popular places, like Portugal, Spain, and Greece, attract around €750 million each year through the options.

Finally, some evidence suggests that that a few individuals are “serial investor migrants.” That is, they acquire citizenship through investment in a place like Saint Kitts or Dominica and then use their new nationality when applying for residence by investment. The end result is to multiply the options in their “mobility portfolio.” Though complete numbers are not available, there are at least 100 serial investor migrants, with most gaining residence in the UK, though some have acquired visas for Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, and Portugal. Indeed, the island federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis – whose entire population of 55,000 would fit into Arsenal Stadium – had the highest per capita uptake of the UK’s Tier 1 (Investor) visa.

The impact of Covid-19 on the programmes remains to be seen, and it will take some time for its impact to appear. Many government ministries slowed or stopped application processing during the pandemic, and travel to submit biometric information for the applications has yet to resume completely. The result is long backlogs in many countries. However, it is likely that the pandemic, as well as Brexit, will bring a change in the demographics of demand.

Principally, it is likely to increase. The pandemic has meant that even more wealthy people have felt hemmed in by borders and are likely to hedge the risk in the future by ensuring they can move smoothly across them and spend time in desirable locales. But the composition may change as well as more wealthy people from western countries, suddenly facing limited mobility, search for solutions. As a result, Americans and Brits may fuel a boom in demand for golden visas

www.samigration.com


I have lived here for most of my life': 180 000 Zimbabweans in SA face uncertain future

 * *The four-year Zimbabwe Exemption Permit lapses in December and the government has not yet indicated if it will renew it.*

  * *About 180 000 Zimbabweans in the country are affected.*

  * *Financial institutions have warned that they will be obliged to  freeze accounts if the permits are not renewed.*

Thousands of holders of the Zimbabwe Exemption Permit (ZEP) are living in uncertainty because the South African government has not yet indicated whether it will renew their permits, GroundUp writes

About 180 000 Zimbabweans hold ZEPs. The four-year permit expires on 31 December.

Some Zimbabweans said their banks had already warned them to renew their permits or face closure of their accounts in December.

The permits were first issued in 2010 under the Dispensation of Zimbabweans Project (ZDP). The programme was renewed in 2014 as the Zimbabwe Special Permit (ZSP), before the ZEP was introduced in 2017

A Zimbabwean, who we will only identify as Matthew, said he can’t make plans for the future. He is a supervisor at a restaurant and lives in New Brighton with his wife and two children. He has been living in South Africa for 20 years.

"I started with an asylum seeker permit before I got the ZDP, ZSP and the ZEP. I have lived in this country for the better part of my adult life. It will be heartbreaking if the government refuses to renew the permits.

"I have two bank accounts and insurance as well as burial policies. These will all go down the drain if the government refuses to extend the permits."

He says he is established in the community and his children speak fluent Xhosa. "They identify themselves with local culture because they were born here," he said.

It's becoming worse every day, it is too much now – Zimbabweans in SA try to help relatives

Another ZEP holder said South Africa should grant citizenship to those who have lived legally in the country for five or more years.

"Some people have invested a lot in the country. Others have bought immovable property, which they will be forced to leave," he said.

Zimbabwe Migrants Support Network chairperson Chris Mapingure said: "We appeal to the Department of Home Affairs to issue a statement regarding the renewal of the ZEP."

Chairperson of the Zimbabwe Exiles Forum, advocate Gabriel Shumba, said he was receiving an unprecedented number of enquiries from concerned permit holders.

 

Shumba said: 

It is an issue that seriously affects thousands of Zimbabweans, especially with some banks threatening to close accounts.

DHA has not responded for comment

Sa Migration.com

 


Home Affairs must ensure ABIS delinquents pay back the money

MP says audit indicated that some of personnel involved have left organisation and hence

The DA welcomes the finding of a forensic audit of the Automated Biometric Information System (ABIS) contract between Home Affairs and EOH Mthombo.

The irregular award of the biometrics project, and subsequent irregular payments, is yet another case of what happens when officials are appointed through the policy of Cadre Deployment.

The Forensic audit has found that disciplinary and criminal charges should be considered against SITA, EOH Mthombo and Home Affairs officials involved in wrong doing.

The audit indicated that some of the personnel involved have left the organisation and hence escaped the enquiry. It simply cannot be allowed that government employees leave one department under a cloud and simply parachute into another government department for a fresh start. The DA has called on SITA and Home Affairs to ensure that those who left to avoid disciplinary action are followed and face the consequences of their action, and will follow up on this.

Those who steal money from government are really stealing money from the people of South Africa - this is not government money, it is taxpayer money.

Despite Minister Aaron Motsoaledi claiming that only R299 864.25 was lost, millions have been lost through inflated payments and the cost of having to run the existing system, HANIS, more than 7 years past its end of life in parallel with ABIS while the contractual wrangling has dragged on.

The DA has called on Home Affairs to leave no stone unturned to recoup monies lost and will continue to hold Home Affairs to account to ensure that the guilty parties face the consequences of their actions and do not enjoy a soft landing in a new redeployment.

www.samigration.com